LONDON, England - January 18, 2010 - Claims by the world's leading climate scientists that most of the Himalayan glaciers will vanish within 25 years were last night exposed as nonsense.
The alarmist warning appeared two years ago in a highly influential report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
At the time the IPCC insisted that its report contained the latest and most detailed evidence yet of the risks of man-made climate change to the planet.
But the experts behind the warning have now admitted their claim was not based on hard science - but a news story that appeared in the magazine New Scientist in the late 1990s.
That story was itself based on a telephone conversation with an Indian scientist who has since admitted it was little more than speculation.
The revelation is a major blow to the credibility of the IPCC, which was set up to provide political leaders with clear, independent advice on climate change.
It follows the recent “Climategate” email fiasco in which scientists at the University of East Anglia were shown to have manipulated data in order to strengthen the case for man-made climate change.
Dr. Benny Peiser, of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said, “The IPCC review process has been shown on numerous occasions to lack transparency and due diligence.”
The alarmist warning appeared two years ago in a highly influential report by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
At the time the IPCC insisted that its report contained the latest and most detailed evidence yet of the risks of man-made climate change to the planet.
But the experts behind the warning have now admitted their claim was not based on hard science - but a news story that appeared in the magazine New Scientist in the late 1990s.
That story was itself based on a telephone conversation with an Indian scientist who has since admitted it was little more than speculation.
The revelation is a major blow to the credibility of the IPCC, which was set up to provide political leaders with clear, independent advice on climate change.
It follows the recent “Climategate” email fiasco in which scientists at the University of East Anglia were shown to have manipulated data in order to strengthen the case for man-made climate change.
Dr. Benny Peiser, of the Global Warming Policy Foundation, said, “The IPCC review process has been shown on numerous occasions to lack transparency and due diligence.”