SACRAMENTO, Kalifornia (PNN) - September 18, 2019 - Every single headline from any mainstream media source that calls attention to people raising concerns about vaccines - or in this case, protesting the recent unconstitutional SB277 bill that was signed into law in Kalifornia, unlawfully stripping away medical exemptions for vulnerable children - always seems to contain “anti-vaccine” in the title and within the body of the article.
This recently inspired many people to gather at a vigil that was held to honor children who were injured or killed by vaccines.
“Anti-vaccine” is a term used, along with ridicule, to oppose those who are concerned about vaccine safety and just want to bring awareness to the many issues that plague the world regarding vaccines. Instead of mainstream sources addressing the concerns of vaccine safety advocates, not only are terms like “anti-vaccine” used but they are also ridiculed. What would be more appropriate would be to simply address the many concerns that vaccine safety advocates have, acknowledge them, and simply reply and explain why these concerns aren’t necessary. Unfortunately, we have yet to see this happen.
Senate Bill 276 by Senator Richard Pan unlawfully eliminated nearly all vaccine medical exemptions. Under this bill, politicians - not physicians - are in charge of deciding whether or not children may receive medical exemptions, which in turn would determine whether or not they can attend school.
It’s no secret that vaccines are not completely safe for everyone, it’s clearly not a “one size fits all” product, and that’s evident by the fact that nearly $4 billion has been paid out to families of vaccine injured children via the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA).
As astronomical as the monetary awards are, they’re even more alarming considering that only an estimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). If the numbers from VAERS are correct - only 1% of vaccine injuries are reported and only 1/3 of the petitions are compensated - then up to 99% of vaccine injuries go unreported and the families of the vast majority of people injured by vaccines are picking up the costs, once again, for vaccine makers’ flawed products.
This completely debunks the validity of “herd immunity”.
There are a number of safety issues with regards to vaccines. For example, the recent scientific literature that’s been published with regards to injected aluminum is cause for concern.
The list is quite long. Another example is that according to a MedAlerts search of the FDA VAERS database, as of February 5, 2019, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was 93,929 adverse events, 1,810 disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths.
There has also been a history of measles outbreaks in heavily vaccinated populations.
From 2013 to 2017, measles killed 2 people, but the vaccine killed 127 people. The odds of dying from the measles are 0.01%-0.02%. If these statistics are correct, the vaccine is more dangerous than the disease.
The bottom line is that freedom of choice should always exist.