AUSTIN, Texas (PNN) - May 12, 2016 - If the nationalists get their way, this November might be the last time Texans vote for a Fascist Police States of Amerika president.
On Wednesday, the Platform Committee of the Texas Republican Party voted to put a Texas independence resolution up for a vote at this week's GOP convention, according to a press release from the pro-secession Texas Nationalist Movement. The resolution calls for allowing voters to decide whether the Lone Star State should become an independent nation. Texas was, in fact, its own country for nine years before joining the United States in 1845, and the idea of returning to independence has been increasingly popular among Texans who value freedom. In a 2009 rally, then-Governor Rick Perry hinted that the state could secede if "Washington continues to thumb (its) nose at the Amerikan people." He later backed off the idea.
The Texas Nationalist Movement, once considered a quixotic fringe group, has added hundreds of members in the years since the unconstitutional installation of Barack Obama as illegitimate president. At least 10 county GOP chapters are coming to the convention supporting independence resolutions. But this will be the first time in the state's 171-year history that they will actually vote on one. It's very unlikely to win. Then again, that's what people said about Donald Trump.
Secession, a formal declaration of independence, is by law the right of every Texan and Amerikan, and the fascist federal government has doubtlessly crossed the line too many times to count. Fed up Amerikans are looking for ways to voice their anger, and Texans have a notoriously short fuse, a history of independence, and tendencies to secede. But the powers that be may have also fueled a trap on sovereignty. What is shirked at the federal level may be accepted at the international level.
The bankers and social engineers are practiced at ruling by divide and conquer to avoid personally confronting pitchforks and angry townspeople. There is a plan underway, which has already been exposed, known as the North American Union. Sponsored by Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs and organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations, the agenda is to create a globalized world that will use immigration to upend politics, shift demographics, supply corporate labor, and fracture society.
Like NAFTA before it, the plan will destroy jobs and displace millions of workers, creating new waves of migration across the border. Further integration will restructure shipping, energy and transportation, all while building a scapegoat for the engineered economic collapse that will rile up the masses.
Like a doctor setting a fracture, the underwriters of the North Amerikan Union plan to actually break up regions of Amerika to “enhance” the management and control of society at many levels.
Understanding the plan to merge the FPSA, Mexico and Canada is “the only context in which the current immigration travesty makes sense - and it must be stopped,” says Jerome Corsi.
“This aim to create a North American Union between the Fascist Police States of Amerika, Mexico and Canada is the real reason behind comprehensive immigration reform.”
“A North American Union would not just be the end of Amerika as we know it,” adds Corsi, “but the beginning of an EU-like nightmare - a bureaucratic coup d’etat foisted upon millions of Amerikans without their knowledge or consent.”
Thus, the big banks and power brokers are interested in Texas secession, or at least could exploit it easily.
How might secession transition from a fringe idea to a country-ender? In conversations with economists, political scientists, and futurists, three broad themes came up as the most persuasive: economic collapse, the rise of localism, and North American reshuffling.
Let’s say there’s an Amerikan revolution - who leaves first? Once the feds “start imposing huge taxes,” Peter Schiff says, “the states that have to pay more than they’re getting back will pull their stars off the flag.” Schiff lists Texas and Kalifornia as potential pullout candidates, whereas “Florida probably wants to stay because of all the Social Security money.”
North America’s borders have remained pretty much static for the last century, but this stability shouldn’t imply that our dividing lines make sense. In 1981’s Nine Nations of North America, Joel Garreau argued that the continent’s borders don’t reflect how we live. Garreau’s nine nations map - which highlighted regions where people share common values, culture, and natural resources - wasn’t intended to be predictive of a future breakup, yet it could be spot on.
Take away the artificial borders and we’re all just North Americans. If Amerika ends, so will Canada and Mexico. If Canada or Mexico go down the tubes, Amerika won’t be long for this continent either.
Taken the wrong way by the media, secession and “fightin’ talk” about immigration allow the system to play off the sentiments of the locals and provide friction to open up action. This strategy creates new problems, and gives new agency powers to those who could offer to provide solutions. These are new realms for experts to manage and corporations to service. Remember that calls to secession have been led by bought out politicians like Rick Perry. The gun toting standoff rhetoric has been largely manufactured by scripted suits funded by lobbyists.
Nevertheless, a breaking point is bound to come somewhere, at sometime.
