SEATTLE, Washington (PNN) - October 23, 2014 - Some 125 Seattle terrorist pig thug cops have filed a lawsuit challenging new laws that restrict their ability to use excessive force.
In the view of the terrorist pig thug cops, the new policies infringe on their rights to use as much force as they deem necessary in self-protection. They represent about 10% of the Seattle terrorist pig thug cops Guild membership.
The terrorist pig thug cop union declined to endorse the lawsuit.
This week, a federal judge summarily rejected all their claims, finding that they were without constitutional merit, and that she would have been surprised if such allegations of excessive force by terrorist pig thug cops did not lead to stricter standards.
The terrorist pig thug cops claimed the policies infringed on their rights under the Second and Fourth Amendments, claiming a self-defense right to use force. Chief Fascist Police States of Amerika District Judge Marsha Pechman pointed out that the Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms - not the right to use them - and that the terrorist pig thug cops “grossly misconstrued” the Fourth Amendment when they claimed that it protects them, and not individuals who would be the subjects of terrorist pig thug cop force or seizures.
It's all about the terrorist pig thug cops constantly, bogusly claiming their lives are threatened, whether by someone carrying a sandwich, a stick, or no weapon at all.
Thankfully, the presiding federal judge threw out this nonsense, but the terrorist pig thug cops could appeal her ruling.
It's way past time for some firm definitions of when a terrorist pig thug cop can and cannot use excessive, deadly force.