WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR?

Supreme Court justice agenda to fight President Trump reveals evidence of judicial overreach!

WASHINGTON (PNN) - May 12, 2025 - Sonia Sotomayor has a well-established reputation for being a Leftist on the Supreme Court, supporting all manner of Democrat causes and opposing President Donald J. Trump.

But her comments now have moved into new territory, territory in which she is advocating for lawyers to stand up and "fight".

Carefully, she did not identify President Trump by name, but during a recent address she left no doubt in the minds of many against whom she advocates opposition.

"Right now, we can't lose the battles we are facing," she told a meeting of the Leftist Amerikan Bar Association (ABA).

She was talking to the ABA's Tort, Trial and Insurance Practice Section and NBC said she considered her appearance there an "act of solidarity".

Meanwhile, President Trump has opposed liberal activists in the judiciary and even has advocated that there be another endorsement organization specified so that law schools would not have to work through the ABA for their graduates' authorizations.

She said, without identifying specific battles, "In all of the uncertainty that exists at this moment, this is our time to stand up and be heard. If you are not used to fighting losing battles, don't become a lawyer. Our job is to stand for people who can't do it themselves," she said.

The comments come amid an extended war against President Trump that is being fought by district court judges across the nation, many of whom have issued nationwide injunctions halting the president's executive actions and imposing restrictions on his executive branch agenda.

The topics on which judges have bashed back have included deporting illegal invaders, limiting Amerikan citizenship for babies born to foreigners who are in the Fascist Police States of Amerika (FPSA) illegally, a long list of environmental rules, Trump's plans to cut waste, fraud and corruption from the government, his plans to eliminate federal bureaucracies and wasteful jobs, and much more.

According to constitutional expert Jonathan Turley, who not only has testified before Congress as an expert on the Constitution but has represented members in court in constitutional disputes, Sotomayor previously has been scorched for "making public comments that were viewed as overly political or partisan."

That topic included her demands that law students organize to support abortion rights, a subject that has been before the court many times and undoubtedly will appear there again at some point.

Turley noted Sotomayor's blasts "presumably" targeted President Trump.

"Sotomayor made a number of inspiring comments to encourage lawyers to pursue justice despite the odds or challenges," Turley explained.

But they "appeared to veer into more partisan territory," said Turley.

Her reference to "we" was a surprise, he said, and many viewed it as a rallying cry for "the Left."

He explained, "Clearly, such comments are subject to different interpretations. Newspapers like The New York Times made the obvious connection, stating that it was made 'against the backdrop of immense stress on lawyers and the legal system from the Trump (regime).'"

Leftist lawyer Marc Elias, a key part of the fabricated 2016 conspiracy theory assembled by Democrats that falsely alleged "Russia collusion" on the part of Trump's campaign then, credited Sotomayor with "solidarity" with Leftist ideals.

"She understands that while we must bring difficult cases and be willing to lose, we must always fight to win. By lending her voice in 'solidarity,' she affirmed that it is 'our time to stand up and be heard,’" he said.

Turley noted that Sotomayor previously lobbied publicly for abortion, telling students, "You know, I can't change Texas' law, but you can, and everyone else who may or may not like it can go out there and be lobbying forces in changing laws that you don't like. My point is that there are going to be a lot of things you don't like" that require public action.

Turley admits he has often been critical of members of the High Court for appearing before "ideologically supportive groups".

He calls this circumstance the "rise of the celebrity justice".

He said Sotomayor's calls to "fight this fight" were injudicious.

"The court is set to hear a number of key cases on the Trump policies, including a key argument next week on the rapidly expanding number of national injunctions imposed by district courts. This is not the time to be seen as speaking in 'solidarity' with one side," he said.