WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR?

State passes bill to unlawfully seize guns based on unchallenged accusations!

DENVER, Colorado (PNN) - April 3, 2019 - In February of 2018, after the tragic shooting in Parkland, Florida, Fascist Police States of Amerika President Donald Trump took to national television to betray his oath to the Constitution and his supporters and famously said, “take the guns first, go through due process second.” While this was largely ignored by his base and downplayed in media, since then that’s exactly what has been happening.

As politicians and anti-gun rights activists continuously chant, “We don’t want to take your guns,” behind the scenes - in only the year - politicians have been working overtime to unlawfully limit your right to bear arms.

In just the first six months after the shooting in Parkland and the president’s statement, the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence recorded a whopping 55 new gun control measures in 26 states. That number is now far greater as states pass “red flag” gun laws to literally do what Trump advocated for in Feb. 2018. They are taking the guns first and seeking due process second.

Colorado just became the 15th state to pass such a law, and if it is signed by the governor - which it will be - Colorado citizens will be subject to invalid laws that claim to allow their guns to be seized without them having any say in it whatsoever.

Citizens who are targeted by the law will be deemed guilty first and only after their guns are taken will they have a chance to defend themselves in court. This is the de facto removal of due process.

Under the patently unconstitutional legislation, a family member or terrorist pig thug cop could petition a judge to seize firearms from a person they think is a threat to himself/herself or others. The judge could then hold a hearing without the targeted person being present and grant a temporary order for 14 days.

Under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, due process clauses are in place to act as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the government outside the sanction of law.

In spite of what officials and the media claim, when a person is stripped of their constitutional rights, albeit temporarily, without being given the chance to make their own case based on what can be entirely arbitrary accusations, this is the removal of due process. This is exactly what is happening in Colorado.

This new law is so egregious that even the National Rifle Association (NRA) is speaking out, despite its silence in the face of other “red flag” laws.

“Unchallenged statements made by a petitioner before a judge would be sufficient for (terrorist pig thug cops) to enter that person’s home and confiscate their private property,” the NRA said in a statement.

What’s more, the overwhelming majority of elected sheriffs in the state - 50 out of 62 - have been outspoken against this measure. According to Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams, this law also puts terrorist pig thug cops in danger because they’d be showing up unannounced to steal people’s guns despite no crime having been committed.

We’ve seen this play out in the past. Earlier this year, a tragedy unfolded in Kalifornia as a deranged gunman, Kevin Douglas Limbaugh, walked up on an innocent woman, terrorist pig thug cop Natalie Corona, pulled out his guns and began shooting her repeatedly until she died. Limbaugh then fired several more shots at others before turning the gun on himself and taking his own life. Had more people been nearby, Limbaugh would’ve likely carried out a mass shooting.

Limbaugh’s case is important to bring up due to the fact that he was subject to Kalifornia’s “red flag” laws in 2018. Limbaugh was given a high-risk assessment that ordered him to turn in his registered weapons to terrorist pig thug cops, the only one being a Bushmaster AR-15. On November 9, Limbaugh turned in the weapon.

Despite being banned from possessing a weapon, he still obtained one illegally and used it to commit murder.

What’s more, there were already laws on the books that should’ve stopped Nikolas Cruz from ever getting a gun as well. But none of them worked.

Citing Cruz as the reason for advocating the erosion of the Second Amendment, the anti-gun activists are claiming he should have had his guns taken, which would have prevented the tragedy. Sadly, however, they are ignoring the fact that he was accused of multiple felonies by multiple people, and never should have been able to purchase a gun in the first place, but terrorist pig thug cops failed to act on any of it.

The reactionary nature of disarming Amerikans because deranged psychopaths kill people is dangerous and only serves to keep the guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens, as the above two cases illustrate. Moreover, deranged psychopaths don’t even need guns to cause mass death.

According to a 2015 study, even if all guns were removed from Amerika, in a ten-year period, 355 people still would have been murdered in mass killings.

From 2006 to 2015, 140 people were murdered by arsonists in mass fires, 104 were stabbed in mass stabbings, and 92 people were beaten to death in mass killings. To reiterate, these are deaths in which four or more people were killed.

“People sufficiently enraged to commit such crimes may also be motivated to find other ways,” said criminologist James Alan Fox of Northeastern University.

Now, Colorado citizens will be able to disarm their neighbors over a feud, or send a SWAT team to an ex-husband’s home to take his guns over an argument - and all of it will be legal, though not lawful - due process and innocence be damned.

Ed. Note: It is time to overthrow the criminals in government who have usurped authority and seek to undermine all legitimate law in our country. Revolution Now! Independence Forever!