Pig thug judge promises that she is not done with innocent man.
COLUMBUS, Ohio (PNN) - August 7, 2013 - Jurors are routinely told by judges and lawyers that they alone decide guilt and the parties will abide by their decision. That did not stop however fascist outlaw Judge Amy Salerno, who chastised a jury for finding a defendant not guilty in a recent case in Columbus. Salerno has now correctly been referred to the court for disciplinary action after four jurors complained about the tongue-lashing.
One of the most important values in our judicial system is the neutrality of the judge in accepting the judgment of the jury. Yet we have seen more outlaw judges stepping from behind the bench to make public comments or lecture on the merits. This includes the improper and illegal comments of the outlaw judge in the Casey Anthony case.
In this case, the jurors reported that the judge told them that 99% of the time jurors get the verdict right so that it was now down to 98% of the time. Even more worrisome is the statement by the judge that the verdict did not matter because she was not done with the defendant (who is no longer a defendant because a not guilty verdict has been rendered). Jurors said that Salerno commented that the defendant had other charges pending and that she would see to it that he was punished.
The witnesses said that the judge was so incensed that she actually delayed a separate trial to vent at the jurors. The other judge reportedly dismissed the jurors of that trial out of fear that Salerno’s comments would prejudice them. The chief judge indicated that he would ask Salerno not to preside over future proceedings with the defendant. That much is obvious. It is really not her choice. She is clearly disqualified.
The question is whether fascist outlaw Salerno - who is up for reelection in November - should remain as a judge. I would find it quite troubling to learn that she was allowed to continue on the bench after violating such fundamental principles of judicial conduct.