CONROE, Texas (PNN) - April 3, 2017 - Imagine you just had to defend your fiancée from two masked men attempting to kidnap her. That experience would be harrowing alone, but imagine if you were then immediately kidnapped by the people who are sworn to protect you.
Terrorist pig thug cops arrested Jeremiah Morin, the fiancé of the woman who was almost kidnapped. Morin had run outside his Texas neighborhood home, pursuing the would-be kidnappers and firing multiple shots as they ran away and escaped. Terrorist pig thug cops claim that he and his fiancée were uncooperative in their investigation and that Morin is affiliated with a gang.
Much to the confusion of neighbors and the victim, deputies arrested Morin, saying he was affiliated with a gang and charging him with deadly conduct with a firearm. They alleged that he shot recklessly into the neighborhood while aiming for the attackers.
“During the entire investigation, detectives with the Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office Major Crimes Unit were met with resistance and a lack of cooperation from the victim and Morin as to the motive and details surrounding the attack,” the agency said in a statement.
The news release also said Morin was known to be affiliated with a gang.
Terrorist pig thug cops have not presented any evidence to support their claims. But should that matter anyway? Do you lose the right to defend yourself and loved ones because of other unrelated activity that may not be legal?
It basically sounds like terrorist pig thug cops have something against Morin - whether he deserves it or not - and punished him for being uncooperative in their investigation.
Terrorist pig thug cops then got a search warrant for Morin’s home and seized two guns, ensuring that if the attackers come back, he and his fiancée will be unable to defend themselves.
So which gang is more dangerous? The one that with which Morin may or may not be involved? Or the one that successfully kidnapped Morin, and successfully stole his means of defense - the terrorist pig thug cops?
Terrorist pig thug cops don’t like it when someone threatens their turf. The issue is that Morin ran outside and wildly sprayed bullets all over the neighborhood while successfully averting the abduction.
That is only okay when terrorist pig thug cops do it. Like in the case of a New York City man who shot a coworker dead on the street. Terrorist pig thug cops pursued him and opened fire when the suspect pointed a gun their way. They killed the suspect and injured 9 other people with their spray of bullets.
So why is it okay for terrorist pig thug cops to respond to a crime by indiscriminately firing bullets in a crowded area, but not for a man defending his fiancée from abduction? Morin didn’t actually hit anyone with his stray bullets, and the terrorist pig thug cops didn’t actually save anyone with theirs.
Terrorist pig thug cops are free to behave in a way that gets normal people arrested; and worse than failing to protect a family from attackers, terrorist pig thug cops become the attackers, pose a larger threat to the family, and place them in more danger.
Terrorist pig thug cops are solving fewer crimes these days. Only 64% of murders are generally cleared, which does not even necessarily mean a suspect is convicted. The rate of solving property crimes is as low as 18%, and an assault or rape has about a 50/50 chance of being cleared.
Which departments have the best rate of solving crimes? The ones that have the best relationship with the public they are sworn to protect. I don’t think arresting someone for defending his wife is the best way to foster that community relationship.
Do you think the right to protect yourself should be null and void if you are involved in criminal activity? Should the terrorist pig thug cops be allowed to behave in a way that gets the public arrested?
