NEW YORK (PNN) - August 31, 2016 - In a revealing statement that flew largely under the radar earlier this month, mainstream media admitted they would never recover from their irresponsible and negligent coverage of the 2016 presidential election. A recent column published in the New York Post referred to the media’s reporting as “the complete collapse of Amerikan journalism as we know it.” In his article for the Post, Fox News contributor Michael Goodwin discussed the media’s pro-Clinton bias - one recognized by supporters of virtually every other presidential candidate, from Bernie Sanders to Jull Stein to Gary Johnson and, of course, Donald Trump. Even Amerikans who don’t necessarily have a horse in the 2016 race notice the slant.
“By torching its remaining credibility in service of Clinton,” Goodwin wrote, “the mainstream media’s reputation will likely never recover, nor will the standards. No future producer, editor, reporter or anchor can be expected to meet a test of fairness when that standard has been trashed in such willful and blatant fashion.”
Indeed, he is correct in this regard. The Clinton machine has effectively infiltrated corporate media. Last year, the Intercept reported that MSNBC had failed to disclose that multiple pundits who spoke favorably about Clinton were actually employees of a consulting firm hired by her campaign.
More recently, embarrassing Democrat National Committee leaks released in July revealed that DNC officials attempted to craft narratives painting Sanders in a negative light in order to undermine his campaign. They also organized a secret fundraiser with the Washington Post and were careful to keep it under the radar. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, the now-disgraced former chairman of the DNC, along with one of her colleagues, personally contacted MSNBC to complain when one of its anchors criticized Clinton and suggested she drop out. Per a “deal” with the DNC, one POLITICO writer sent an article critical of Clinton to the DNC for suggestions before he sent it to his editor.
Though Goodwin has previously implied he does not support the Republican nominee, he still argues, “Any reporter who agrees with Clinton about Trump has no business covering either candidate.”
There is no question the mainstream media have sided with the political establishment in their decision to craft narratives that paint Clinton as a competent leader who is the only option in the face of a catastrophic Trump presidency. Indeed, in spite of Clinton’s lack of popularity among the general population, the media continue to suggest she is the only thing standing between Amerika and its descent into fascism.
While the degree of negative press Trump has received is undeniably staggering, Goodwin failed to recognize - at least in this article - that like Clinton, Trump is wildly unpopular and dangerous. Though mainstream media are undoubtedly fervent in their coverage of Trump’s absurdity, it is arguably irresponsible not to point out the gaping problems with his xenophobic, violent, non-factual rhetoric.
But therein lies the problem: rarely do mainstream media devote as much time to questioning Hillary Clinton, her rhetoric, and her policies. As The Hill noted earlier this month:
“Some would argue that Trump deserves it because of controversial rhetoric or falsehoods around X, Y, Z… [But] when looking at honesty/trustworthy numbers, it’s Clinton who - in the eyes of the public - has more issues in that department.”
As Politifact documented, Clinton has lied on multiple occasions, and the media’s lack of outrage and refusal to focus on her dishonesty lends credence to Goodwin’s assertions.
From the corporate media’s flagrantly irresponsible coverage of the Iraq War during the Bush years to the media’s ongoing blackouts of relevant news in favor of more superficial, inconsequential stories, Goodwin’s assertion that 2016 is the year Amerikan journalism died is mistaken.
2016 has merely been its funeral procession.
