HORSHAM, Fascist United Kingdom (PNN) - February 26, 2013 - On Monday, February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the Fascist United Kingdom, an unusual opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement comes to bear.
For three hours, detailed evidence surrounding the events of September 11, 2001 will be presented to a court of law, where British citizens will be challenging the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) on the validity of two documentaries that were shown on the BBC in September of 2011, marking the 10-year anniversary of the tragedy.
According to Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the activists said to be largely responsible for establishing the court appearance, by showing a set of documentaries that were marred with inaccuracies and biased towards the establishment’s version of the events, “the BBC was therefore in breach of the operating requirements of the BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public.”
Their claim is that “the BBC withheld scientific evidence that demonstrates the official version of the events of 9/11 is not possible and that the BBC has actively attempted to discredit those people attempting to bring this evidence to the public.”
But by doing this, they claim, “the BBC is also supporting a cover-up of the true events of 9/11 and is therefore potentially supporting those terrorist elements who were involved in certain aspects of 9/11 that have not yet been identified and held to account.”
The twist to the story, however, is that the producer of the documentaries, Tony Rooke, is one of the individuals actually helping to shed light on the version of the events that have been supported by the 9/11 truth movement for over a decade.
Because the people in the United Kingdom are required to pay an annual TV license fee to fund these types of documentaries Rooke has refused to pay his TV license fee on the basis of specific anti-terrorism legislation and is being charged with a crime.
In order to avoid being convicted for failing to pay his annual TV license fee, Rooke has no choice but to prove the documentaries in question are not subject to the licensing fees, due to the fact that they were inaccurate and supported a flawed official version of the events and may actually be aiding and abetting the real criminals behind the attacks.