WASHINGTON (PNN) - May 23, 2013 - A new precedent has been set. Despite extensive denial that drone strikes would endanger Amerikans, fascist Attorney General Eric Holder has now openly admitted that four Fascist Police States of Amerika citizens were killed through overseas drone strikes since 2009.
While not on FPSA soil, the deaths of the FPSA citizens in nations like Yemen and Pakistan highlight the new precedent being set by terrorist FPSA government heads who wish to use drones as a form of lethal enforcement onFPSA soil. With Holder admitting that Amerikans have alreadydied via drone strikes following his statements that Obama can alreadyinitiate drone strikes on FPSA soil, we are now seeing the way paved to go ahead and announce armed drones to fight terrorism here in the FPSA.
We all remember the initial rhetoric that drones were “no real threat,” and that they were simply unarmed scouting machines used tosavelives overseas.
Then we saw them rapidly enter the nation, and we heard the same tired reassurances. We saw them killing innocents overseas with high powered weaponry being attached to these “scouting” drones, and we see them still doing so today. But once again we’re told not to worry. Political talking heads like Eric Holder assure us that domestic drones, for which over 1,400 permits have been issued, are not meant to be used as weapons. That is, unless dictator Obama decides to use drones as a weapon of war on FPSA soil.
Despite the message of assurance regarding the promise that domestic drones would never turn into government-controlled war machines, Eric Holder decided to go ahead and announce that it would actually be entirely legal for Obama to issue a drone strike on a FPSA citizen on domestic soil. In fact, Holder does not rule out the possibility of domestic drone strikes, and that a scenario could occur in the future; and to strike someone with a drone, of course,you would need weaponry. You would need an armed drone.
In other words, Holder is going against the major promise by the Federal Aviation Administration that no armed drones will be flying on domestic soil. Holder says the government has “no intention” right now of issuing drone strikes on FPSA soil. Just like the government never targeted Constitution- and conservative-based groups through the Internal Revenue Service and would never use domestic drones to spy on you. Quite simply, if any power is given to these individuals in government, be sure of one thing: they will use it.
Knowing the track record of drone strikes overseas and how they greatly affect the innocent, drone strikes on FPSA soil against citizens is an even more serious threat. The 3,000 plus deaths from drone strikes overseas in Pakistan alone, which vastly affect the innocent and non-threatening, have even prompted Google employees and big firms alike to develop charts and interactive maps to detail the deaths in a manner that portrays the reality of the situation. One design firm known as Pitch recently went and created an interactive chart that, along with detailing how less than 2% of strike victims are high priority targets, documents the drone strike deaths throughout recent years.
We continue to hear these major announcements from Holder regarding drone strikes, and each time it pushes the precedent further. Each time, he warps the law to justify what is being done with drone attacks, and each time we come closer to the announcement that we need to use armed drones against domestic terrorists. Just wait for the next terrorist hunt in the FPSA for a high profile crime case to hear more from Holder and his gang of fascist outlaw thugs on why we need armed domestic drones to keep us safe.