Mounties fear angry Canadians may rebel against fascist federal government.

OTTAWA, Ontario, Canada (PNN) - March 25, 2024 - A task force has weighed the possible threat from violent extremism driven by politics, religion and ideology. It concluded that of the three, a Canadian federal election would most likely be impacted by ideologically motivated violent extremism.

It can only be due to a lack of proper analysis that this development isn’t considered a pivotal moment in Canadian politics. Myriad concerns on the part of the Canadian public should rightly emanate from an attempt to inject the “fear factor” into the spine of society.

Angry Canadians may rebel isn’t any different than stating that “Country X may drop a nuclear bomb on Country Y.” Speculation is not fact. Anyone can speculate about any form of pending catastrophe, from end-of-the-world biblical prophecy to warnings of a pending climate apocalypse.

While extremist narratives and conspiracy theories do not usually manifest themselves as an act of serious violence, they have the potential to negatively affect the fabric of Canadian society.

Since when is “negatively affecting” a society a unique circumstance within the continuum of civilized societies? For what purpose would media point to such a circumstance? Is there an underlying message to be gleaned from what is being offered in this regard?

Firstly, an off-loading of responsibility. According to our press, society’s woes are emanating not from government decision-making, but rather due to disgruntled members of the public.

One could argue that this is a case of government instructing the press to offer rationalization for more drastic impediments on individual rights and freedoms in our country. Is this a case of planting a seed for what will inevitably result from these circumstances?

Consider the following: the neo-socialist Liberal-NDP coalition of fascist Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh is in complete free-fall. A future election looks be an absolute wipe-out, a decimation of Trudeau government control of society.

By what method could the neo-communists retain control? We look to the concept of Martial Law.

Martial law involves the temporary substitution of military authority for civilian rule and is usually invoked in time of war, rebellion, or natural disaster. When martial law is in effect, the military commander of an area or country has unlimited authority to make and enforce laws. In free societies, martial law is unlawful.

An invocation of the Emergencies Act by the Liberals justified by the Trucker’s Convoy to Ottawa may not constitute martial law, but it does plant a seed of possibility. It’s the way authoritarian takeovers work - a perpetual “massaging” of society in incremental fashion, leading to an ultimate goal of which the public remains unaware.

The task force report says anti-authority extremists have almost certainly leveraged social media posts about foreign interference in Canadian elections to reinforce pre-existing narratives around the inherent corruption of government institutions in Canada.

Translation: on behalf of government, the media validate an invocation of Bill C-63, the Liberal government’s anti-free speech “Online Hate” legislative proposal, thereby validating two pieces of draconian governance - an ability to invoke some form of martial law (read police state), as well as rationalization for censorship of free speech.

Threats against politicians have become increasingly normalized due to extremist narratives prompted by personal grievances and fueled by what the fascist government calls misinformation or deliberate lies.

Why wouldn’t this occur, when by historical standards politics in Canada are today anything but normal. “Fueled by misinformation and lies” serves as further validation of Internet censorship. Who is to say what constitutes these maladies? Why, that would be PM Trudeau and team. The statement is entirely subjective - one man’s misinformation being another man’s truth.

An increase in threats against politicians results from threats average Canadians experience based on economic standards, financial stability, increases in personal debt, inflation, and increased taxation.

Eschewing responsibility on behalf of the Feds, we see media’s true colors as arbiters of right and wrong. It never used to be this way, not that one can expect time to stand still. In this can be witnessed a morphing of media into a branch of government - just as it is in China.

Trudeau and the Liberals have ruined our national economy, in addition to making life unaffordable for the next generation of Canadians.

Under these circumstances, and in consideration of political polls, it’s time to give another Party an opportunity to run our economy in a productive manner. Nothing strange or rebellious about that.

Yet rather than heap culpability on those deserving of it, media plant the idea that the “poor may rebel,” thus planting a seed for government to respond to remedy social rebellion.

When media cast aside these concepts they are freed from speculation of another form: the idea that political partners Trudeau and Singh desire public rebellion. Running our country into the mud in the name of woke globalist imperatives, the situation may serve as justification for a cancellation of an election in late 2025.

The stones on Canada’s political pathway continue to roll in this ominous direction.