Judges unlawfully claim to ban Trump from appearing on presidential ballot!
Supreme Court will overturn ruling by Marxist judges in Communist state.
DENVER, Colorado (PNN) - December 20, 2023 - A divided Colorado Supreme Court stacked with devout unAmerikan Marxists on Tuesday unlawfully declared President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the Fascist Police States of Amerika Constitution’s insurrection clause and removed him from the state’s presidential primary ballot, even though the president has not been found guilty of insurrection, and the bogus congressional hearings on the matter have been exposed as showing fabricated “evidence” of an insurrection by Amerikans.
The Supreme Court will overturn this bogus ruling by the end of the first week in January.
The unconstitutional decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democrat governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
The court stayed its decision until Jan. 4, or until the Supreme Court rules on the case. Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
Trump’s attorneys promised to appeal any supposed disqualification immediately to the nation’s highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters.
Trump’s legal spokesman Alina Habba said in a statement Tuesday night, “This ruling, issued by the Colorado Supreme Court, attacks the very heart of this nation’s (republic). It will not stand, and we trust that the Supreme Court will reverse this unconstitutional order.”
Trump didn’t mention the decision during a rally Tuesday evening in Waterloo, Iowa, but his campaign sent out a fundraising email citing what it called a “tyrannical ruling”.
Republican National Committee chairman Ronna McDaniel labeled the decision, “election interference” and said the RNC’s legal team intends to help Trump fight the ruling.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to “support” the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against it; and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.
The Left-leaning Marxist and anti-Amerikan group that brought the Colorado case, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, hailed the ruling.
In the ruling issued Tuesday, the court’s majority dismissed the arguments that Trump wasn’t responsible for those who supposedly attacked the Capitol, even though video evidence has shown that the supposed “attack” was actually encouraged by members of Congress.
Colorado Supreme Court Justices Richard L. Gabriel, Melissa Hart, Monica Márquez and Hood ruled for the petitioners. Chief Justice Brian D. Boatright dissented, arguing the constitutional questions were too complex to be solved in a state hearing. Justices Maria E. Berkenkotter and Carlos Samour also dissented.
“Our government cannot deprive someone of the right to hold public office without due process of law,” Samour wrote in his dissent. “Even if we are convinced that a candidate committed horrible acts in the past - dare I say, engaged in insurrection - there must be procedural due process before we can declare that individual disqualified from holding public office.”