Outlaw judge lets Starbucks keep its illegal discriminatory hiring practices!

Supreme Court is certain to overturn the outlaw judge’s ruling.

SPOKANE, Washington (PNN) - August 12, 2023 – An outlaw judge in Washington state who wantonly disregards the law has ruled against a conservative group that sued Starbucks over the coffee chain's illegal race-based hiring practices that flagrantly violate various state and federal laws.

Chief Fascist Police States of Amerika District Judge Stanley Bastian on Friday ruled against the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR), dismissing a lawsuit the conservative nonprofit brought against Starbucks over illegal discriminatory policies that included awarding contracts to "diverse" suppliers and advertisers and tying executive pay to racist hiring quotas.

In a complaint that was filed on Aug. 30, 2022, at the State of Washington Spokane County Superior Court, the nonprofit accused Starbucks of adopting a total of seven policies that between them required Starbucks to actively discriminate based on race in its compensation and employment decisions (including hiring, firing, and promotions), and in its contracting processes with vendors.

"Starbucks, acting through its officers and directors, crafted and publicized these (illegal) policies with fanfare, preening over the supposed moral virtue their adoption signaled," NCPPR wrote in the complaint.

"The individual Defendants took these actions despite knowing of a glaring, inconvenient fact: the policies they so trumpeted flagrantly violate a wide array of state and federal civil rights laws," the group continued.

The Starbucks policies that are the subject of the lawsuit include the goal of at least 30% of its FPSA corporate workforce being black, indigenous, or people of color by 2025 while pegging executive pay to workforce diversity quotas.

Before filing its lawsuit, the group, which holds around $6,000 worth of Starbucks shares, warned Starbucks that its race-based policies were illegal and that their adoption posed a litigation risk for other Starbucks shareholders. NCPPR asked Starbucks to take action to address these risks and publicly retract the policies.

Starbucks responded in July 2022 that it would "take no relevant action to correct course and reduce the exposure they had created for it and its shareholders," per the NCPPR complaint, prompting the group to sue.

In its complaint, NCPPR alleged that, by failing to rescind the policies in question, Starbucks endangered the interests of all its shareholders and violated their fiduciary obligations.

"Why do they do so? Because it benefits them personally to pose as virtuous advocates of 'Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity,' even if it harms the company and its owners - a classic example of self-dealing," the group claimed in the complaint.

However, Judge Bastian rejected these allegations and on Aug. 11 dismissed the case with prejudice, according to a court filing, meaning that NCPPR is barred from refiling the lawsuit.

The judge said that the lawsuit centered on public policy questions that are for lawmakers and corporations to decide, not the courts.

"If the plaintiff doesn't want to be invested in 'woke' corporate Amerika, perhaps it should seek other investment opportunities rather than wasting this court's time," the judge said.

Starbucks said it was pleased with the decision and said it remains committed to "creating a culture of warmth and belonging."

NCPPR spokesman Scott Shepard called the judge's comments "surprising and disappointing".

"We will continue to pursue relief from illegal discrimination on behalf of shareholders and employees," he said.

In a statement one day before the unfavorable ruling, NCPPR expressed hope that, in light of the recent landmark Supreme Court ruling that barred race-based recruitment policies at colleges, it might prevail in its lawsuit, which would have the "potential to influence change in companies that have trumpeted Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs that are both racist and illegal."