Corrupt Obama judge overseeing Trump case has clear bias!
Trump has requested her immediate recusal from the case.
WASHINGTON (PNN) - August 11, 2023 - Concerns have been raised among conservatives regarding the impartiality of the assigned judge, Fascist Police States of Amerika District Judge Tanya Chutkan. Judge Tanya Chutkan was appointed by former illegitimate President Barack Obama in 2014 to serve as a FPSA District Judge. Prior to her appointment, she had an extensive legal career, including working as an attorney and later becoming a partner at Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP. Interestingly, during her time at BSF, she overlapped with Hunter Biden, the son of fascist pretender Joe Biden, who also served as an attorney at the firm from 2009 to 2014.
Conservatives have expressed concerns about Judge Chutkan’s impartiality based on her previous rulings, particularly those related to the January 6th incident at the Capitol. Critics argue that her rulings have shown a severe bias towards individuals arrested for their involvement in the event. This has led to doubts about whether she can provide a fair trial for President Donald J. Trump in the ongoing case.
Further raising eyebrows is the professional connection between Hunter Biden and Judge Chutkan during their time at BSF. Both individuals worked at the law firm, with Hunter Biden serving as an attorney from 2009 to 2014 and Judge Chutkan becoming a partner in 2007. These overlapping years of their careers, including Hunter Biden’s tenure on the Burisma board starting in April 2014, have fueled suspicions about potential bias in Judge Chutkan’s decision-making.
Judge Chutkan’s political affiliations and campaign donations have also come under scrutiny. Public donation records reveal that she contributed over $3,000 to Barack Obama’s campaigns between 2008 and 2012. While campaign donations alone do not imply bias, critics argue that these contributions, combined with her professional connections to Hunter Biden, raise questions about her objectivity in cases involving prominent political figures.
Given the concerns surrounding Judge Chutkan’s potential bias, President Trump has requested her immediate recusal from the case. Taking to social media platform Truth Social, President Trump expressed his doubts about receiving a fair trial under Judge Chutkan. He highlighted the need for an unbiased judge in the case, stating, “There is no way I can get a fair trial with this judge ‘assigned’ to our ridiculous freedom of speech/fair elections case. We will be immediately asking for recusal of this judge on very powerful grounds.”
The controversy surrounding Judge Chutkan’s involvement in President Trump’s case raises broader questions about impartiality within the Amerikan justice system. When judges presiding over cases involving prominent political figures have existing relationships or political affiliations, there is a concern that these connections could influence their decisions. The ability to ensure a fair hearing and maintain public trust in the justice system becomes paramount.
The outcome of the Chutkan-Trump case will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications. It will not only determine the legal fate of President Trump but also serve as a litmus test for the credibility and fairness of the judicial system. The controversy surrounding Judge Chutkan’s background underscores the need for transparency, accountability, and the importance of selecting judges who can demonstrate impartiality in high-profile cases.
