NIH doesn’t recommend ivermectin because its panel members have conflicting interests!

on . Posted in Patriot News Network

WASHINGTON (PNN) - September 22, 2021 - The National Institutes of Health (NIH) does not think that anyone should ever be allowed to use ivermectin to try to treat a COVID-19 infection. The reason is because its board members have financial interests elsewhere.

By allowing ivermectin to be used as an early treatment for COVID-19, NIH board members could lose money in their other investments.

According to the NIH, there is supposedly “insufficient evidence” to support the use of ivermectin, which means that the agency will not recommend its use. Upon closer look, though, “insufficient evidence” is just a convenient excuse.

The truth, according to revelations brought to light via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, is that numerous NIH board members have direct financial ties to Merck, a pharmaceutical company that just so happens to have campaigned against the use of ivermectin for treating COVID-19.

Merck, by the way, manufactures ivermectin and it would appear that its financially tied board members at the NIH have been instructed to hold out for a new on-patent replacement so they can all make more money.

Adaora Adimora, Roger Bedimo, and David V. Glidden are among the NIH board members who get paid by Merck to pursue its interests. These interests do not include prescribing ivermectin to treat the Fauci Flu, which explains why the NIH opposes its use.

Another NIH board member, Susanna Naggie, also has a conflict of interest in that she was awarded a $155 million grant to study ivermectin after she voted to oppose the drug’s recommendation.

“Funding for the study would have been difficult to justify if the drug was recommended for use in COVID-19,” reported TrialSiteNews. “It is not known, however, if the panelist was aware of that opportunity or was planning to apply for that grant at the time of the deliberations on ivermectin.”

In order to claim that there is “insufficient evidence” supporting ivermectin’s use in treating COVID-19, the NIH had to sidestep the mountain of evidence showing that the drug does, in fact, fight viruses.

The NIH basically had to pretend as though all the independent science out there in support of ivermectin does not actually exist. Instead, we were told, ivermectin is just a “horse dewormer” that people should ignore for their own safety.

This tactic might work on people who believe everything the television tells them and who never do any of their own research, but to everyone else this is an obvious lie.

Not only has the NIH made a total mockery of itself, but it has defiled the notion that Amerikans can trust their regulatory bodies to tell them the truth for the sake of public health.

The only thing that Merck, the NIH and their ilk care about is their own bank accounts. Your life certainly does not matter to these greed-buckets, who will continue to watch people needlessly die while raking in all that special interest cash.

The fact that the NIH would not even publicly reveal why it issued a non-recommendation for ivermectin is telling in and of itself. What other skeletons in the closet are this fake public health agency trying to hide?

“The deception and secrecy surrounding the NIH ivermectin non-recommendation should have raised serious doubts about its integrity,” TrialSiteNews explained. “The grotesque conflicts of interest of panel members should make it clear that the NIH, as the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) with its slandering of ivermectin as a ‘horse dewormer,’ should not be taken seriously.”

Meanwhile, this pharma-industrial complex of corruption is trying to cut off all ivermectin prescriptions, which would make it far more difficult for people to access the COVID-19-defeating drug.

Eulogies

Eulogy for an Angel
1992-Dec. 20, 2005

Freedom
2003-2018

Freedom sm

My Father
1918-2010

brents dad

Dr. Stan Dale
1929-2007

stan dale

A. Solzhenitsyn
1918-2008

solzhenitsyn

Patrick McGoohan
1928-2009

mcgoohan

Joseph A. Stack
1956-2010

Bill Walsh
1931-2007

Walter Cronkite
1916-2009

Eustace Mullins
1923-2010

Paul Harvey
1918-2009

Don Harkins
1963-2009

Joan Veon
1949-2010

David Nolan
1943-2010

Derry Brownfield
1932-2011

Leroy Schweitzer
1938-2011

Vaclav Havel
1936-2011

Andrew Breitbart
1969-2012

Dick Clark
1929-2012

Bob Chapman
1935-2012

Ray Bradbury
1920-2012

Tommy Cryer
1949-2012

Andy Griffith
1926-2012

Phyllis Diller
1917-2012

Larry Dever
1926-2012

Brian J. Chapman
1975-2012

Annette Funnicello
1942-2012

Margaret Thatcher
1925-2012

Richie Havens
1941-2013

Jack McLamb
1944-2014

James Traficant
1941-2014

jim traficant

Dr. Stan Monteith
1929-2014

stan montieth

Leonard Nimoy
1931-2015

Leonard Nimoy

Stan Solomon
1944-2015

Stan Solomon

B. B. King
1926-2015

BB King

Irwin Schiff
1928-2015

Irwin Schiff

DAVID BOWIE
1947-2016

David Bowie

Muhammad Ali
1942-2016

Muhammed Ali

GENE WILDER
1933-2016

gene wilder

phyllis schlafly
1924-2016

phylis schafly

John Glenn
1921-2016

John Glenn

Charles Weisman
1954-2016

Charles Weisman

Carrie Fisher
1956-2016

Carrie Fisher

Debbie Reynolds
1932-2016

Debbie Reynolds

Roger Moore
1917-2017

Roger Moore

Adam West
1928-2017

Adam West

JERRY LEWIS
1926-2017

jerry lewis

HUGH HEFNER
1926-2017

Hugh Hefner

PROF. STEPHEN HAWKING
1942-2018

Hugh Hefner 

ART BELL
1945-2018

Art Bell

DWIGHT CLARK
1947-2018

dwight clark

CARL MILLER
1952-2017

Carl Miller

HARLAN ELLISON
1934-2018

Harlan Ellison

STAN LEE
1922-2018

stan lee

CARL REINER
1922-2020

Carl Reiner

SEAN CONNERY
1930-2020

dwight clark

L. NEIL SMITH
1946-2021

L Neil Smith