How the digital age is really affecting our brains!

on . Posted in Articles of Interest

REDMOND, Washington (PNN) - May 19, 2015 - A comprehensive Microsoft study is offering insights into how living in the digital age is affecting our ability to sustain attention, and how our brains are adapting to the constant flow of new stimuli. Although the results confirmed the suspicions that the information overflow is affecting our ability to focus on one task for long periods of time, the news isn't all bad, as it seems we're also training our brains to multitask more effectively.

When the dinner guest of Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh offered to wash the dishes before enjoying some tea together, the master asked his guest if he truly knew how to wash the dishes. For, said the master, there are two ways of doing so: washing the dishes in order to enjoy a cup of tea later on, and washing the dishes in order to wash the dishes. If one washes the dishes the first way, then he also won't be able to enjoy the tea, as his mind will again be solely preoccupied with what comes next. But in the second way, even the simplest of tasks becomes enjoyable.

In the age of constant smartphone notifications, flashy ads and extreme multitasking, it seems that keeping a Zen-like focus on a single task for extended periods of time is increasingly becoming a utopia; and because we know that our brains are remarkably flexible, adapting to our habits and environment, it's interesting to ask how people (heavy technology users in particular) are being affected by the digital age.

At first, it would be sensible to assume that the never-ending flow of stimuli is hurting our attention spans, as we quickly become accustomed to switching from watching TV, multi-tabbing our Internet browsers, and tinkering with our smartphones in a constant, addictive search for the next dopamine hit.

But a comprehensive study by Microsoft revealed that things aren't quite as black and white. Attention cannot be reduced to a single figure, because different tasks require different types of attention. The Microsoft study distinguished between three types of attention - sustained (maintaining prolonged focus during repetitive activities), selective (avoiding distraction), and alternating (efficiently switching between tasks), and set out to understand how factors such as social media usage and multi-screening behavior affected different types of attention.

The research consisted of a comprehensive survey of 2,000 Canadians of all ages, along with in-depth neurological surveys to better quantify attention spikes. Although some results came out as expected, there were a few surprises.

The Microsoft data showed that our ability to sustain attention for long periods of time (the staple of meditative practice) does indeed seem to be dwindling. According to the study, the volume of media and social media consumption are the factors that most affect us in that sense: the heavier the use, the more sustained attention is adversely affected.

Microsoft speculates that the reason for this is probably the thrill of the new: we're suckers for novelty, and finding new information often makes connected users jump from one experience to the next.

But there is a silver lining: according to the data, higher use of social media, one of the very factors that damages sustained attention the most, is also increasing our ability to have short bursts of high attention.

You might think that spending more time online or with highly engaging media would train us to filter out distractions, but the researchers found this was not the case.

Age, gender and web usage don't seem to significantly impact selective attention. However, using a second screen (for instance, looking at your smartphone while watching TV) causes a very drastic drop in the ability to pay attention to what really matters. Heavy multi-screeners are, according to the study, very easily distracted, as they find it very difficult to filter out irrelevant information.

One explanation advanced by the researchers is that, whether you live in rural Africa or in busy New York City, survival depends on being able to focus on what’s important, and generally that is what's moving. This skill doesn't appear to have changed with our environment: it looks like it has simply moved to the digital world.

The Microsoft data also suggests that we're getting better at quickly and efficiently switching between tasks that require different cognitive skills. While multi-screening was the main culprit for diminishing our selective attention, it seems it's also the single biggest contributor to improving our alternating attention, which is useful for multitasking more effectively.

According to the study, 76% of those interviewed between the ages of 18 and 24 report that multitasking is the only way they get things done. Once more, age and gender alone don't seem to significantly impact our ability to multitask, but multi-screening (and, to a lesser extent, social media usage) is correlated with an increased ability to multitask more efficiently.

Multi-screening also seems to improve overall attention, encoding to memory, and to a lesser extent, emotional involvement with the content to which we are being exposed.

Of course, too much of anything can be damaging. The survey also served to highlight that many people under 30 are showing signs of addictive behavior with respect to their smartphones. A staggering 77% of Canadians interviewed between the ages of 18 and 24 say they reach for their phone whenever nothing is occupying their attention; 52% say they check their phone at least every 30 minutes; and 79% say they use other devices while watching TV.

All in all, we can now say that a healthy and non-compulsive use of smartphones does indeed have some beneficial effects, and particularly as you're doing something else, as you're effectively training your brain to multitask.

But if you're driving, or in the middle of a meaningful eye-to-eye conversation, please stick to the Zen way.

Eulogies

Eulogy for an Angel
1992-Dec. 20, 2005

Freedom
2003-2018

Freedom sm

My Father
1918-2010

brents dad

Dr. Stan Dale
1929-2007

stan dale

MICHAEL BADNARIK
1954-2022

L Neil Smith

A. Solzhenitsyn
1918-2008

solzhenitsyn

Patrick McGoohan
1928-2009

mcgoohan

Joseph A. Stack
1956-2010

Bill Walsh
1931-2007

Walter Cronkite
1916-2009

Eustace Mullins
1923-2010

Paul Harvey
1918-2009

Don Harkins
1963-2009

Joan Veon
1949-2010

David Nolan
1943-2010

Derry Brownfield
1932-2011

Leroy Schweitzer
1938-2011

Vaclav Havel
1936-2011

Andrew Breitbart
1969-2012

Dick Clark
1929-2012

Bob Chapman
1935-2012

Ray Bradbury
1920-2012

Tommy Cryer
1949-2012

Andy Griffith
1926-2012

Phyllis Diller
1917-2012

Larry Dever
1926-2012

Brian J. Chapman
1975-2012

Annette Funnicello
1942-2012

Margaret Thatcher
1925-2012

Richie Havens
1941-2013

Jack McLamb
1944-2014

James Traficant
1941-2014

jim traficant

Dr. Stan Monteith
1929-2014

stan montieth

Leonard Nimoy
1931-2015

Leonard Nimoy

Stan Solomon
1944-2015

Stan Solomon

B. B. King
1926-2015

BB King

Irwin Schiff
1928-2015

Irwin Schiff

DAVID BOWIE
1947-2016

David Bowie

Muhammad Ali
1942-2016

Muhammed Ali

GENE WILDER
1933-2016

gene wilder

phyllis schlafly
1924-2016

phylis schafly

John Glenn
1921-2016

John Glenn

Charles Weisman
1954-2016

Charles Weisman

Carrie Fisher
1956-2016

Carrie Fisher

Debbie Reynolds
1932-2016

Debbie Reynolds

Roger Moore
1917-2017

Roger Moore

Adam West
1928-2017

Adam West

JERRY LEWIS
1926-2017

jerry lewis

HUGH HEFNER
1926-2017

Hugh Hefner

PROF. STEPHEN HAWKING
1942-2018

Hugh Hefner 

ART BELL
1945-2018

Art Bell

DWIGHT CLARK
1947-2018

dwight clark

CARL MILLER
1952-2017

Carl Miller

HARLAN ELLISON
1934-2018

Harlan Ellison

STAN LEE
1922-2018

stan lee

CARL REINER
1922-2020

Carl Reiner

SEAN CONNERY
1930-2020

dwight clark

L. NEIL SMITH
1946-2021

L Neil Smith

JOHN STADTMILLER
1946-2021

L Neil Smith