SANTA CLARA, Kalifornia (PNN) - July 17, 2023 - It is now 2023 and while most Fascist Police States of Amerika colleges have rescinded their unlawful COVID jab mandates, some criminal colleges are still refusing to end the unlawful tyranny.

Santa Clara University in Kalifornia is one of the most overtly criminal of the institutions doing this.

In April 2021, after most incoming freshmen had committed, criminal SCU announced that all students were required - though now law does or can exist establishing such a requirement - to get poisonous COVID jabs for fall enrollment or after full approval, whichever was later.

By mid-summer, SCU announced that students would be required to receive the so poisonous and nonrequired jab even if it remained authorized for emergency use only (EUA) and despite the fact that the Kalifornia Health and Safety Code codifies the Nuremberg Code, which prohibits such mandates under penalty of death by hanging.

“There is, and will continue to be, a growing need for protection for citizens of the state from unauthorized, needless, hazardous, or negligently performed medical experiments on human beings. It is, therefore, the intent of the Legislature, in the enacting of this chapter, to provide minimum statutory protection for the citizens of this state with regard to human experimentation and to provide penalties for those who violate such provisions.”

SCU (and many other Kalifornia colleges and universities) are in direct violation of this Code and FPSA law for removing informed consent by mandating poisonous EUA medical treatments.

Despite lack of efficacy or adequate safety data for this overwhelmingly healthy young adult population, in December 2021, fascist criminal SCU said they were mandating the poisonous booster midway through the academic year when students would have no choice but to comply or leave tens of thousands of dollars behind. SCU’s three-dose requirement remained through the 2022-23 school year. Ed. Note: There is another option: sue the school for actual damages plus punitive damages.

In complete disregard for the end of the emergency declarations in early April 2023, when most universities announced the end of their unlawful COVID jab mandates, SCU updated its requirement for incoming freshmen.

On May 8th, one week after the fall 2023 enrollment deadline, SCU quietly updated its poisonous COVID jab policy to require one bivalent dose for incoming freshmen (but not returning students) regardless of how many COVID jabs they had previously taken. SCU backdated this announcement to May 1st thinking no one would take notice, but in private emails from incoming students we learned that some were furious. We encouraged them to withdraw and accept another offer.

On May 31st, SCU updated its policy again. It now says it requires either three previously taken monovalent doses or one bivalent dose for all community members. Of course, its mandates are invalid and unenforceable, but many students do not know that and are therefore defrauded into taking the poisonous jab (which is grounds for a major lawsuit filed by each student so impacted).

As with the fascist criminal University’s previous unlawful and therefore invalid mandates, SCU offers no religious or medical exemptions for students, even in the most extreme of circumstances. Faculty and staff, however, are permitted to request exemptions.

SCU’s policy is determined by its opaque “COVID-19 team,” believed to be led by campus physician Dr. Lewis Osofsky, who also holds several positions at Santa Clara County Medical Association (SCCMA). SCCMA partners with the Santa Clara County Public Health Department (SCCPH) to maximize COVID-19 poisonous jabs. Santa Clara County is one of the most vaccinated counties in the country, with more than a third having received the bivalent booster, twice the national average, and 88.5% having received the primary series.

Osofsky’s positions in the SCCMA include chair of the Professional Standards and Conduct Committee, tasked with promoting high ethical standards for physicians and investigating disputes involving unethical conduct.  This is ironic, as Osofsky is believed to be a driving force behind SCU’s ethically indefensible and criminal mandate. Medical ethics would require, at a minimum, both transmission prevention and a proven benefit for students. An antibody increase from vaccines, with no established antibody level correlate of protection, wanes in mere weeks, and cannot support the ethics of a mandate. In fact, a recent study demonstrated that the “greater the number of vaccine doses previously received the higher the risk of COVID-19.”

Furthermore, Osofsky has improperly denied student medical exemptions. In a March 2022 lawsuit filed against SCU, Harlow Glenn, one of the student plaintiffs, claims that she had serious adverse reactions to her primary series COVID vaccines, including an emergency room visit due to leg paralysis and abnormal bleeding. According to the complaint, Osofsky refused to grant her a medical exemption for the required booster and actively interfered with her doctor-patient relationship by contacting her private doctors to persuade them to retract their medical exemption documentation.

Such aggressive tactics are nothing new for Osofsky, who is a criminal, as he illegally employs them against patients in his private pediatric practice. Parents have complained in online reviews that Osofsky’s office unlawfully forced vaccines and didn’t listen to patients’ concerns. As it turns out, Blue Cross Blue Shield pays pediatricians in private practice a $40,000 bonus for every 100 patients under the age of 2 that they fully vaccinate, if at least 63% of the patients are fully vaccinated (including the annual flu vaccine). Osofsky’s roles with SCCMA, which is in partnership with the SCCPH whose goal is to maximize poisonous COVID jabs, as well as his aggressive private practice approach to all vaccinations, have likely played a large role in SCU’s continued criminal COVID vaccine mandates.