by Tyler Durden

December 21, 2022 - Early on in March 2020 I was leery of the hysteria surrounding COVID and decided my course of action was to be wait and see. At the time I was under the impression that I was a freeborn citizen with a number of unalienable rights, including sovereignty over my bodily choices.

When the talk started about new vaccines being imminent, I again decided I would wait and see whether the vaccines were all they were cracked up to be. This was then, and it was an entirely reasonable position to take, screeching from media and Twitter hounds notwithstanding. I didn’t expect it would turn out to be more like “wait and see how totally out of hand this will get.”

• Wait and see how the government will forcibly close businesses
• Wait and see how treatments will be suppressed
• Wait and see how hysteria captured the media
• Wait and see how healthy populations will be subjected to house arrests
• Wait and see how terrorist pig thug cops will shoot protesters
• Wait and see how a pregnant mother will be arrested for a Facebook post
• Wait and see how medical services across state borders will be denied
• Wait and see how “wait and see-ers” will be demonized
• Wait and see how family and friends will betray their loved ones

I’ve waited long enough, and I’ve seen more than enough. Thankfully, the worst, most violent excesses have abated for now, if you exclude the ongoing carnage of short and long-term “vaccine” injury. There are lingering abominations from the blitzkrieg of lockdowns and “vaccine” mandates, but generally there is a sense that an uneasy peace, or maybe a phony war, has descended upon us.

Of course, there is still a serious amount of COVID pantomime occurring.

Exhibit A: a TV news report recently showed a road accident victim doing rehab with a mask on, then happily chatting without a mask to the reporter, also without a mask. If he was worried about COVID he’d leave it on for the interview, or if he wasn’t worried, he wouldn’t wear it while doing rehab. Seems you can have it both ways these days provided you don’t think about it too much.

Exhibit B: Last year, cricket teams in the BBL were decimated if one of the players had a positive test and others were “close contacts.” Umpires refused to hold a bowler’s cap or sunglasses for fear of the spicy cough. Last night, two players on one team played despite not only testing positive, but also feeling unwell. If there is no practical change when a player has COVID, why do we need to know about it?

Answer: we don’t, but it has become normalized to disclose players’ private health statuses, just as it is normalized now to ask anyone any kind of detailed personal health question that satiates the questioner’s ghoulish fetishes. While player fitness has always been a matter of interest to sports fans, especially those who like a bet, illness used to be dealt with in a formulaic way, such as “Player X is not playing tonight due to illness.” There’s no need to know any further details.

It is counterproductive to scoff at these insanities - those who have not yet come in their own time to see the inconsistencies are not suddenly going to see the light because of a witty remark. The most likely reaction is an equally irrational and possibly heated defense of the person or the rule. In valued relationships, the only sensible course is studied silence. Even a raised eyebrow in front of the TV can crank the tension in the room up a notch or two.

But these annoyances over masks and “COVID protocols,” that overused euphemism for voodoo superstitions, are yesterday’s skirmishes in a war that has moved on to other theaters. The central battle is about freedom and autonomy. To the extent that the spoils of the “mask and protocol” incursions can be re-weaponized against us, winning the freedom and autonomy battle will be that much harder.

How could we resist a forced medical treatment having once rolled over to experimental gene therapy?

How can we fight against programmable digital currency when once we have accepted “card only” cashiers and accommodated the idea of shopping for “essential items” only and allowing a cop to rummage around in our shopping trolley?

The legislative bricks in the wall continue to be put into place with little if any scrutiny. Doctors are now unable to give opinions that depart from government health advice without risking de-registration. Pandemic laws born as bastard sons of Parliaments suspended under state of emergency powers are now legitimized as permanent statutes, requiring only a declaration to bring them all into force once again. Digital IDs are now compulsory for all company directors, including Moms and Dads who happen to be directors of their own superannuation funds. Ordinary citizens are surely next.

How is it that our lawmakers feel it appropriate to make these kinds of changes? No one asked for them. How is it they can ignore letters and petitions? Why do they partner with unelected globalists and make treaties on which we won’t be allowed to vote? How is it that our civil rights institutions were so toothless? They didn’t even utter a whimper, let alone a growl. How is it that our professional bodies and business associations were silent?

Only a few brave souls protested. How is it that our terrorist pig thug cop forces humiliated themselves to the point where they were taping off children’s playgrounds and fining elderly women for sitting on a park bench? We long ago gave up on the idea that mainstream media would hold authorities to account.

In the end the explanations, whether we get them or not, whether they make sense or not, are beside the point. Nothing can change what happened. By some miracle we might avert what they have planned, but it’s going to be a hell of a fight.

Once upon a time, we sweated on daily case numbers when the new cases per day were less than 10; now we barely think of them, and they are in the thousands, if not the tens of thousands. There’s only one conclusion to be drawn - it was never about public health, and it still isn’t. It was always about control.