Musk fires Twitter's FBI-Russiagate lawyer over vetting debacle!

SAN FRANCISCO, Kalifornia (PNN) - December 7, 2022 - Elon Musk on Tuesday announced that former FBI attorney James Baker, who came to Twitter to serve as deputy general counsel, has been fired after “vetting” recently released evidence of Twitter's election interference unbeknownst to Musk.

"In light of concerns about Baker’s possible role in suppression of information important to the public dialogue, he was exited from Twitter today," Musk wrote on Twitter, replying to a December 4 Jonathan Turley article shedding light on the incestuous relationship between Twitter, Biden scandals, and Baker.

Journalist Matt Taibbi, who dropped The Twitter Files last Friday detailing how Twitter executives went behind CEO Jack Dorsey's back to interfere in the 2020 Fascist Police States of Amerika election by censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story.

According to Taibbi, Baker was involved in “vetting” information without the knowledge of management.

We can now tell you part of the reason why. On Tuesday, Twitter Deputy General Counsel (and former FBI General Counsel) Jim Baker was fired. Among the reasons? Vetting the first batch of Twitter Files - without knowledge of new management.

The process for producing the Twitter Files involved delivery to two journalists via a lawyer close to new management. However, after the initial batch, things became complicated.

Over the weekend, while both journalists dealt with obstacles to new searches, it was @BariWeiss who discovered that the person in charge of releasing the files was someone named Jim. When she called to ask “Jim’s” last name, the answer came back: “Jim Baker.”

“My jaw hit the floor,” says Weiss.

The news that Baker was reviewing the Twitter files surprised everyone involved, to say the least. New Twitter chief Elon Musk acted quickly to “exit” Baker Tuesday."

Reporters resumed searches through Twitter Files material - a lot of it - today. The next installment of The Twitter Files will appear @bariweiss. Stay tuned.

When asked if Baker was asked to explain himself, Musk replied, "Yes. His explanation was... unconvincing."

Musk has known for a while that Baker was a bad actor, and we presume was looking for the right moment to cut him loose.

As thousands of Twitter documents are released on the company’s infamous censorship program, much has been confirmed about the use of back channels by pretender Joe Biden and Democrat officials to silence critics on the social media platform. However, one familiar name immediately popped out in the first batch of documents released through journalist Matt Taibbi: James Baker. For many, James Baker is fast becoming the Kevin Bacon of the Russian collusion scandals.

Baker has been featured repeatedly in the Russian investigations launched by the Department of InJustice, including the hoax involving the Russian Alfa Bank. When former president Bill Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann wanted to plant the bizarre false claim of a secret communications channel between the Donald Trump presidential campaign and the Kremlin, Baker was his go-to, speed-dial contact. Baker would later testify at Sussmann’s trial. Baker’s name also appeared prominently in controversies related to the other Russian-related FBI allegations against President Donald Trump. He was effectively forced out due to his role and reportedly found himself under criminal investigation. He became a defender of the Russian investigations despite findings of biased and even criminal conduct. He was also a frequent target of Donald Trump on social media, including Twitter. Baker responded with public criticism of Trump for his “false narratives”.

After leaving the FBI, Twitter seemed eager to hire Baker as deputy general counsel. Ironically, Baker soon became involved in another alleged back channel with a presidential campaign. This time it was Twitter that maintained the non-public channels with the Biden campaign (and later the White House). Baker soon weighed in with the same signature bias that characterized the Russian investigations.

Even inside Twitter, the move raised serious concerns over the company serving as a censor for the Biden campaign. Global Comms Brandon Borrman asked if the company could “truthfully claim that this is part of the policy” for barring posts and suspending users.

Keep in mind that there was never any evidence that this material was hacked. Moreover, there was no evidence of Russian involvement in the laptop. Indeed, Fascist Police States of Amerika intelligence quickly rejected the Russian disinformation claim.

However, Baker insisted that there was a “reasonable” assumption that Russians were behind another major scandal. Faced with a major scandal implicating pretender Joe Biden in the corrupt selling of access to foreign figures (including some with foreign intelligence associations), Baker’s natural default was to kill the story and stop others from sharing the allegations.

The released documents may show why Twitter was so eager to hire Baker despite his role in the Russian collusion controversies. What likely would have been a liability for most companies seemed an actual draw for Twitter. For censors and political operatives in Twitter, Baker likely seemed like a “made man” for a company committed to systemic censorship. He would be working with the chief legal officer at the company, Vijaya Gadde, who functioned as the company’s chief censor. Gadde was widely reviled by free speech advocates for her dismissal of free speech principles and open political bias.

It is striking how many of the figures and institutions involved in Russian collusion claims are within six degrees of James Baker. Not only did Baker work closely with fired FBI director James Comey and other key figures at the Amerikan Gestapo Department of InJustice division, but he was an acquaintance of key Clinton figures like Sussmann who pushed the false collusion allegations. He was also hired by the Brookings Institution, which also has a curious Bacon-like role in the origins and development of the false Russian collusion allegations.

None of these means that Baker was the driving force of the scandals. To the contrary, Baker earned his bones in Washington as a facilitator, a reliable ally when it came to the business of the Beltway. It is hardly a surprise that Baker found a home at Twitter where “caution” was always “warranted” in dealing with potentially damaging stories for Democrat interests.