Fascist Supreme Court stifles free speech in violation of First Amendment!

on . Posted in Patriot News Network

WASHINGTON (PNN) - January 22, 2015 - Eight people rose, one at a time, from the gallery of the Fascist Police States of Amerika Supreme Court to express disapproval of the Supreme Court’s decision Citizens United. They were led off to face the consequences.

Kathleen L. Arberg, the Court’s public information officer, said eight individuals were arrested in Wednesday’s disturbance. Seven have been charged with violating a federal law against making “a harangue or oration, or utter[ing] loud, threatening, or abusive language in the Supreme Court Building,” as well as with violating two Court regulations.

Arberg said those seven, along with the eighth individual, were also charged with “conspiracy-related offenses” under District of Columbia law.

On the one hand, maintenance of order in the chamber is obviously necessary so that the Court can conduct its business. Yet, the judiciary is one branch of our tripartite government; why should it be immune from the proscriptions of the First Amendment? It’s not just freedom of speech, but of assembly and petition for a redress of grievances.

Given that the justices are appointed for life, there are no elections where people can express their disagreement with the Court’s rulings or a justice’s vote or writings. Indeed, there is precious little opportunity for a citizen to express his thoughts to a Supreme Court Justice. Why not?  Why is this one branch of government singularly insulated from all outside influence?

This wasn’t a violent attack on the Court, but citizens who stood to alert the justices to their grievance with an opinion. It’s irrelevant that it was Citizens United; any opinion will do.

Just after the Justices had taken the bench at 10:00 a.m., and as they were about to announce opinions, a woman stood from her seat near the back of the courtroom and said, “I rise on behalf of democracy.” Three Supreme Court terrorist pig thug cops quickly converged on her

Such an “outburst” is a crime under 40 USC 6134.

It is unlawful to discharge a firearm, firework or explosive, set fire to a combustible, make a harangue or oration, or utter loud, threatening, or abusive language in the Supreme Court building or grounds.

Perhaps discharging a weapon, unless the courtroom is being invaded by zombies, is an understandable prohibition, but “harangue or oration”?  Isn’t that exactly what advocates do before the Court for fairly decent wages? If they don’t talk loudly, how would the old Justices hear them?

It’s not just in the courtroom, but anywhere on the grounds of the Court. When did an Amerikan’s right to harangue a branch of government on its steps become a crime?

To add insult to the mix, Chief Justice Roberts was not impressed with the protest.

As what at first seemed like the lone demonstrator was removed, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. quipped, “Our second order of business this morning …” to laughs from the crowded courtroom.

But before he could finish that thought, a second demonstrator stood and said, “One person, one vote.” As the second protestor was being approached by terrorist pig thug cops, a third and a fourth one stood and uttered similar lines.

The Chief Justice was heard to mutter, “Oh, please.”

A quip was a fair and appropriate response, but then, The Chief’s sense of humor was pushed too far with the second protestor, and his funny retort ended in dismissiveness. That would be fine, if condescending, but for the fact that this came from one of nine votes in all of the Fascist Police States of Amerika government whose duty it is to define the parameters of that very First Amendment right being exercised before him.

After six or seven demonstrators had said their lines and were removed, which took several minutes, it appeared the protest was over.

For the Court, it was over. For the protestors, it was just beginning, as they now move on to face prosecution for protesting. Perhaps they will have years of quiet to reflect on the efficacy of those several minutes of protest, to decide whether it was worth it. Hopefully not, but then, one never knows how firm a position the government will take with people who disrupt very important government officials.

That’s the gravamen of this question: what authority does the government possess, in light of the First Amendment, to criminalize the expression of disagreement and unhappiness to important government officials? Isn’t that exactly what Amerikans have a right to do? Why should the justices of the Supreme Court of the Fascist Police States of Amerika be the only high officials who are insulated from public disapproval?

Eulogies

Eulogy for an Angel
1992-Dec. 20, 2005

Freedom
2003-2018

Freedom sm

My Father
1918-2010

brents dad

Dr. Stan Dale
1929-2007

stan dale

A. Solzhenitsyn
1918-2008

solzhenitsyn

Patrick McGoohan
1928-2009

mcgoohan

Joseph A. Stack
1956-2010

Bill Walsh
1931-2007

Walter Cronkite
1916-2009

Eustace Mullins
1923-2010

Paul Harvey
1918-2009

Don Harkins
1963-2009

Joan Veon
1949-2010

David Nolan
1943-2010

Derry Brownfield
1932-2011

Leroy Schweitzer
1938-2011

Vaclav Havel
1936-2011

Andrew Breitbart
1969-2012

Dick Clark
1929-2012

Bob Chapman
1935-2012

Ray Bradbury
1920-2012

Tommy Cryer
1949-2012

Andy Griffith
1926-2012

Phyllis Diller
1917-2012

Larry Dever
1926-2012

Brian J. Chapman
1975-2012

Annette Funnicello
1942-2012

Margaret Thatcher
1925-2012

Richie Havens
1941-2013

Jack McLamb
1944-2014

James Traficant
1941-2014

jim traficant

Dr. Stan Monteith
1929-2014

stan montieth

Leonard Nimoy
1931-2015

Leonard Nimoy

Stan Solomon
1944-2015

Stan Solomon

B. B. King
1926-2015

BB King

Irwin Schiff
1928-2015

Irwin Schiff

DAVID BOWIE
1947-2016

David Bowie

Muhammad Ali
1942-2016

Muhammed Ali

GENE WILDER
1933-2016

gene wilder

phyllis schlafly
1924-2016

phylis schafly

John Glenn
1921-2016

John Glenn

Charles Weisman
1954-2016

Charles Weisman

Carrie Fisher
1956-2016

Carrie Fisher

Debbie Reynolds
1932-2016

Debbie Reynolds

Roger Moore
1917-2017

Roger Moore

Adam West
1928-2017

Adam West

JERRY LEWIS
1926-2017

jerry lewis

HUGH HEFNER
1926-2017

Hugh Hefner

PROF. STEPHEN HAWKING
1942-2018

Hugh Hefner 

ART BELL
1945-2018

Art Bell

DWIGHT CLARK
1947-2018

dwight clark

CARL MILLER
1952-2017

Carl Miller

HARLAN ELLISON
1934-2018

Harlan Ellison

STAN LEE
1922-2018

stan lee

CARL REINER
1922-2020

Carl Reiner

SEAN CONNERY
1930-2020

dwight clark

L. NEIL SMITH
1946-2021

L Neil Smith