NEW YORK (PNN) - September 18, 2024 - Was the ABC News presidential debate rigged? A bombshell allegation from a whistleblower says the Communist pretender Kamala Harris campaign was given a copy of the questions and was assured that the Communist pretend vice president wouldn’t be fact-checked live on-air during her debate with President Donald J. Trump. An affidavit from this individual was released last weekend. Now, ABC News has responded to these allegations after days of intense speculation, sneaking it in as the news cycle is preoccupied with the latest Trump assassination attempt in West Palm Beach, Florida.

ABC News has again insisted that no topics or questions were shared with either Communist pretender Kamala Harris or President Donald J. Trump and their respective campaigns, in advance of last week’s presidential debate.

The network’s statement came after it declined to directly address allegations - made in a sworn statement by one of its staff - that it helped Harris in the debate.

The name of the person who signed the document is obscured, but in the six pages, he makes claims that - if true - would be explosive.

The allegations include that Harris’ team negotiated specific camera angles to portray her more favorably than Trump. The document also claims the campaign negotiated rules with ABC without involving the Trump team - in direct violation of the agreed-to rules of the debate - and it managed to get the network to avoid specific topics including fascist pretender Joe Biden’s health; Harris’ tenure as “Attorney General in San Francisco”; and her brother-in-law and adviser Tony West.

ABC - which is known to categorically lie rather than admit to any wrongdoing… ever - denied to the Daily Beast last week that Harris was given any questions ahead of last week’s debate. However, everyone who thinks for himself or herself knows that ABC lied when it made that claim.

The lying ABC spokesman - who was paid by the network to lie - also falsely claimed that no aides were in contact with moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis. Trump aides have attacked the moderators as “agents of the Harris campaign” following their efforts, which have been almost universally shown to have indeed rigged the debate.

Communist pretender Kamala Harris’ campaign did not respond to a request for comment on Monday, just like she has refused to answer any questions about anything whatsoever when asked in a non-biassed situation.

Of course, this is the response. What - you thought they were going to admit to such a scandal? There’s one huge problem: no one trusts mainstream media. That balance remains deep in the negative after years of anti-Trump fake news nonsense stemming from the fabricated Russian collusion hoax and the interference on the Hunter Biden laptop, the latter of which was dismissed as a Kremlin disinformation campaign that eventually was proven to be true.

Also, Daily Beast was the go-to outlet ABC News used to first respond to these allegations and offered a blanket denial.

Again, this isn’t an isolated incident: Donna Brazile sent questions to the Hillary Clinton camp in 2016. The top Democrat Party official, a CNN contributor, then lost her gig after these revelations. There is one notable difference: we don’t have WikiLeaks in 2024. These emails from Brazile got leaked because of that site. Who knows what was said now, but if they did it once, is it out of line to suggest they haven’t done so multiple times in the past?

No.

Also, a blanket denial won’t do much in terms of persuasion since we all saw what happened: the allegations panned out, as Communist pretender Kamala Harris lied repeatedly during the event and never got any pushback, unlike how President Trump was treated. Trump’s campaign was expecting unfair treatment, but it was so explicitly biased that even they were surprised. At times, you’d thought communications staffers at the Democrat National Committee were moderating instead of David Muir and Linsey Davis.

While some attention has been placed on Davis and Harris being sorority sisters, it’s this admission from the ABC moderator that will keep the rigged narrative alive - Davis admitted she was going to do live fact checks to avoid a Biden-like meltdown like the one we saw on CNN.

ABC News anchor Linsey Davis admitted in a post-debate interview that her fact-checking of President Trump was influenced by the earlier CNN debate that went disastrously for Biden.

In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Davis said she wanted to address concerns that Trump’s statements could be allowed to “hang” there unchallenged by his opponent or the moderators, as they were when Trump and Biden debated on CNN in June. In other words, she admitted to colluding against Trump and on behalf of Biden.

Who will be fired as a result of this?  Who will be imprisoned as a result of this?

Will justice ever be done to correct this?