Obama cannot take away your guns with UN treaty!

WASHINGTON (PNN) - May 31, 2010 - Gun owners are protected under the auspices of the Second Ammendment of the United States Constitution, but some legal analysts think their rights are not protected when illegitimate President Barack Obama becomes a signatory of a United Nations' treaty on global gun-control restrictions.

The illegitimate Obama regime announced this week its support for the UN Small Arms Treaty. This international agreement poses as a grave danger for freedom for both in the United States and around the globe by making it more strenuous - if not outright illegal - for law-abiding U.S. citizens to keep and bear arms.

According to the Washington Times, "The U.N. claims that guns used in armed conflicts cause 300,000 deaths worldwide every year, an inordinate number of which are the result of internal civil strife with individual nations. The solution proposed by transnationalists to keep rebels from getting guns is to make the global pool of weapons smaller through government action. According to recent deliberations regarding the treaty, signatory countries would be required to 'prevent, combat and erradicate' various classes of guns to undermine 'the illicit trade in small arms.' Such a plan would necessarily lead to confiscation of personal firearms."

This may appear as reasonable solution for governments that don't trust their citizens, yet it represents a dictatorial disregard for the safety and freedom of all U.S. citizens. Not all insurgencies are evil, first of all. As U.S. history reveals, one method of destroying a despotic regime is to revolt against it. That is the very reason why authoritarian regimes such as Syria, Cuba, Rwanda, Vietnam, Zimbabwe and Sierra Leone, enforce strict gun control laws.

As reported by the Washington Times, "the U.N. Small Arms Treaty opens a back door for the (illegitimate) Obama (regime) to force through gun control regulations. Threats to the Second Ammendment are real today as ever."

However, it isn’t true. Even a legitimate President of the United States ia always bound by the restriction of the Constitution. No president can enter into a treaty, whether or not ratified by the Senate, that in any way invalidates the fundamental protections of the Constitution; thus any such treaty is considered invalid ab initio, and nobody’s right to keep and bear arms is diminshed at all.