We might finally have a way to build circuits for quantum computers!

on . Posted in Articles of Interest

PITTSBURGH, Pennsylvania (PNN) - July 8, 2016 - The computers of today have just about hit their limits, and scientists around the world are scrambling to build the first viable quantum computer - a machine that could increase processing speeds 100-million-fold.

The biggest challenge in scaling up a quantum computer is figuring out how to entangle enough quantum bits (qubits) to perform calculations, but a team of engineers in the Fascist Police States of Amerika say they might finally have a solution.

Quantum computers are set to revolutionize how we process data in the future, because they’re not limited to the 1s and 0s of binary code on which today’s computers rely. That binary code is holding us back, because if you can only use a combination of 1s and 0s, there’s a finite amount of data that can be processed, no matter how fast you go.

Instead, quantum computers use qubits, which can essentially take the state of 0, 1, or a “superposition” of the two. So rather than having bits that can only be 1 or 0 at any given moment, qubits can be anything and everything.

"Quantum computers exploit three very unusual features that operate at the quantum scale - that electrons can be both particles and waves, that objects can be in many places at once, and that they can maintain an instantaneous connection even when separated by vast distances (a property called 'entanglement’)," wrote Todd Jaquith for Futurism.

This means that quantum computers can perform many calculations simultaneously, giving them - quite literally - limitless potential. But we have to figure out how to build them first.

Despite what Google’s been saying about its controversial new D-Wave 2X quantum computing machine, no one’s been able to build a “proper” quantum computer, because of how difficult it is to entangle a large number of qubits on a circuit, and control them in any reliable way.

Once derided by Einstein himself as "spooky action at a distance", quantum entanglement is a strange phenomenon where two quantum particles interact in such a way that they become deeply linked, and essentially “share” an existence.

This means that what happens to one particle will directly and instantaneously affect the other - even if it’s many light-years away.

Getting a bunch of entangled particles in the one place is crucial to the development of quantum computers, and researchers from Penn State University say they’ve come up with a technique that could get this done.

First they used beams of laser light to build a three-dimensional lattice array, which could trap and hold onto a bunch of quantum particles, forcing them into a cubic arrangement of five stacked planes. Think of it like a five-layer sandwich with grids of atoms held inside each layer.

Each layer in the circuit could hold 25 equally spaced atoms, and once they were all in position, microwaves were used to switch individual qubits from one quantum state to another without altering the states of the other atoms in the cubic array.

"The scientists filled some of the possible locations in the array with qubits consisting of neutral caesium atoms possessing no positive or negative charge. Then they used crossed beams of laser light to target individual atoms in the lattice, causing a shift in the energy levels of those atoms. When the scientists then bathed the whole array with a uniform wash of microwaves, the state of the atoms with the shifted energy levels changed, while the states of all the other atoms did not," said Katherine Noyes of PC World.

The team, led by physicist David S. Weiss, tested their ability to change the quantum state of these individual atoms by switching the states of selected atoms across three of the stacked planes to spell out the letters P, S, and U (for Penn State University).

"We changed the quantum superposition of the PSU atoms to be different from the quantum superposition of the other atoms in the array," said Weiss. "We have a pretty high-fidelity system. We can do targeted selections with a reliability of about 99.7%, and we have a plan for making that more like 99.99%."

Unfortunately, there are two major limitations here - the system needs to be seriously scaled up, because 125 atoms aren't going to do us much good in the real world, and the quantum particles used in the system hadn't been entangled. As we found out last month, when Chinese physicists quantum entangled 10 photon pairs to set a new world record, entangling multiple particles is hard.

But Weiss's team is confident that they can build on the system they have, both in teams of scale and spooky entanglement action.

"Filling the cube with exactly one atom per site and setting up entanglements between atoms at any of the sites that we choose are among our nearer-term research goals," said Weiss.

Our fingers are crossed for the computers of the future.

The results have been published in Science.

Eulogies

Eulogy for an Angel
1992-Dec. 20, 2005

Freedom
2003-2018

Freedom sm

My Father
1918-2010

brents dad

Dr. Stan Dale
1929-2007

stan dale

MICHAEL BADNARIK
1954-2022

L Neil Smith

A. Solzhenitsyn
1918-2008

solzhenitsyn

Patrick McGoohan
1928-2009

mcgoohan

Joseph A. Stack
1956-2010

Bill Walsh
1931-2007

Walter Cronkite
1916-2009

Eustace Mullins
1923-2010

Paul Harvey
1918-2009

Don Harkins
1963-2009

Joan Veon
1949-2010

David Nolan
1943-2010

Derry Brownfield
1932-2011

Leroy Schweitzer
1938-2011

Vaclav Havel
1936-2011

Andrew Breitbart
1969-2012

Dick Clark
1929-2012

Bob Chapman
1935-2012

Ray Bradbury
1920-2012

Tommy Cryer
1949-2012

Andy Griffith
1926-2012

Phyllis Diller
1917-2012

Larry Dever
1926-2012

Brian J. Chapman
1975-2012

Annette Funnicello
1942-2012

Margaret Thatcher
1925-2012

Richie Havens
1941-2013

Jack McLamb
1944-2014

James Traficant
1941-2014

jim traficant

Dr. Stan Monteith
1929-2014

stan montieth

Leonard Nimoy
1931-2015

Leonard Nimoy

Stan Solomon
1944-2015

Stan Solomon

B. B. King
1926-2015

BB King

Irwin Schiff
1928-2015

Irwin Schiff

DAVID BOWIE
1947-2016

David Bowie

Muhammad Ali
1942-2016

Muhammed Ali

GENE WILDER
1933-2016

gene wilder

phyllis schlafly
1924-2016

phylis schafly

John Glenn
1921-2016

John Glenn

Charles Weisman
1954-2016

Charles Weisman

Carrie Fisher
1956-2016

Carrie Fisher

Debbie Reynolds
1932-2016

Debbie Reynolds

Roger Moore
1917-2017

Roger Moore

Adam West
1928-2017

Adam West

JERRY LEWIS
1926-2017

jerry lewis

HUGH HEFNER
1926-2017

Hugh Hefner

PROF. STEPHEN HAWKING
1942-2018

Hugh Hefner 

ART BELL
1945-2018

Art Bell

DWIGHT CLARK
1947-2018

dwight clark

CARL MILLER
1952-2017

Carl Miller

HARLAN ELLISON
1934-2018

Harlan Ellison

STAN LEE
1922-2018

stan lee

CARL REINER
1922-2020

Carl Reiner

SEAN CONNERY
1930-2020

dwight clark

L. NEIL SMITH
1946-2021

L Neil Smith

JOHN STADTMILLER
1946-2021

L Neil Smith