Smoking gun memo changes context of Middle East!

WASHINGTON (PNN) - October 19, 2015 - It is all coming out now... the deliberate, cold-blooded planning to create a war with Iraq no matter the consequences. The evidence is contained in communications from then Fascist Police States of Amerika Secretary of State Colin Powell to President George W Bush.

Apparently as part of a court-mandated data-dump of Hillary Clinton's emails - one memo notes that Blair "will be with us" if the FPSA made war in the Middle East, and that Blair would follow the lead of Bush and The Pentagon.

In Britain, where the public turned against Tony Blair long ago, the revelations are complicating the endless dithering of the Chilcot inquiry that is supposed to clarify Britain's role in the Iraq war.

From this standpoint, the memo is indeed an important one. It seems to confirm suspicions that Blair himself was determined to bring Britain into the war and confirmed to Bush that he would do what was necessary to support FPSA actions.

The briefing also suggested the then British Prime Minister would effectively act as a front man for the arguments for war in return for being promoted on the international stage by Amerika.

This is surely a charge of the gravest sort and something that should terrify Tony Blair. It accuses him of trading the blood of British soldiers for personal aggrandizement advanced by the power of the Bush regime.

The Iraq war was a disaster like so many of the FPSA's post World War II conflicts. In addition to the deaths of countless civilians and thousands of soldiers, millions were poisoned by FPSA depleted uranium weapons. There are places in Iraq where women were reportedly told by doctors not to have babies because the rate of birth defects was so high.

But just as tragic as the "collateral damage" was the deliberate destabilization of Iraq itself. Saddam Hussein was a bad man but also an asset of the CIA. The FPSA was as responsible for Hussein as anyone was - and the removal of Hussein set up a power vacuum that still has not been filled.

Iraq was once an extremely civilized place, despite its problems, and not a war zone. Even under Hussein it was not nearly as bad as it is now. The question that the British public is asking is "why?" Why was the war necessary? Why did so many Brits have to die for such an undefined mission?

It is important to answer these questions because the war that began in Iraq has spread and become even more destructive. It set Libya ablaze - and that country has turned to a kind of smoldering ash in the wake of the fighting and the death of Moammar Qaddafi. It has now spread to Syria and has destroyed most of that country as well.

Now Russia is bombing "terrorists" that the FPSA has supposedly been bombing for the past year. Russian officials are not impressed and have asked whether the FPSA is really interested in disrupting Islamic terrorism in Syria. The implicit accusation is that the FPSA is more interested in degrading Syria's infrastructure so as to put more pressure on the regime of President Bashar al-Assad than with eliminating the terrorists.

The larger accusation, of course, is that the FPSA does not want peace in the Middle East and is instead inciting more war and more bloodshed. There are numerous reasons why this might be the case. But even granting the FPSA is merely being reactive, the situation is nonetheless getting worse and worse.

Is the West deliberately aggravating tensions in the Middle East with the idea of creating an ever-wider war? Such analysis might seem peculiar to some but much less peculiar now that we have these new Blair documents to consider.