Democrats react as SCOTUS delivers two crushing blows to their radical agenda!
WASHINGTON (PNN) - July 3, 2021 - The Supreme Court handed down two opinions this week that have struck serious blows to the radical Left’s agenda. One decision struck down a Kalifornia law that non-profit groups must disclose funders to terrorist pig thug cops, and another defeated an effort to prevent election integrity laws from being passed in Arizona and other states.
Pretender Joe Biden was apoplectic about the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision to uphold Arizona’s voting law, which enacted such measures as banning ballot harvesting.
Fascist Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Kalif.) blasted both decisions, including the Amerikans for Prosperity decision that prevented Kalifornia from uncovering the group’s funders since it chilled free speech.
The SCOTUS decision on the Arizona law was especially damaging given the significant amount of effort expended to prevent election integrity laws from being passed on the invalid grounds that they are racially discriminatory.
Justice Samuel Alito said that Arizona’s law generally makes it very easy to vote, and he decided that the state’s election law does not violate the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
“In these cases, we are called upon for the first time to apply §2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 to regulations that govern how ballots are collected and counted,” Alito wrote in his opinion. “Arizona law generally makes it very easy to vote.”
The Democrat Party has responded to the defeats as one might predict: with both renewed calls to pack the courts and a push for moderate Justice Stephen Breyer to retire so a more radical judge can be appointed.
The Supreme Court reform commission, however, appears to be “fizzling” on the idea of court-packing.
“An effort by progressives to expand the Supreme Court is starting to fizzle as a commission tasked with reviewing the controversial proposal saps earlier momentum,” the Hill reported.
Democrats are so desperate to weaponize the Supreme Court, or otherwise marginalize it, that legal experts are now weighing methods to reduce the court’s ability to strike down laws.
