Sunlight inactivates COVID-19 eight times faster than previously predicted!

on . Posted in Patriot News Network

LOS ANGELES, Kalifornia (PNN) - April 5, 2021 - Researchers found that sunlight inactivates COVID-19 more than eight times more quickly than predicted. Paolo Luzzatto-Fegiz, a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of Kalifornia, Santa Barbara,  and his colleagues reviewed recent studies that explored the effects of different bands of ultraviolet (UV) light - namely, UVA, UVB and UVC radiation - on SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19.

UVA is weakest among the three while UVC is the most energetic and has been shown to inactivate viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. Nearly all of the UV radiation that reaches the surface is UVA since all of UVC and most of UVB rays are absorbed by Earth’s ozone layer.

Sunlight’s ability to inactivate viruses is often attributed to UVB, which can kill microbes. One of the studies analyzed by the researchers, for example, shows that SARS-CoV-2 becomes inactivate because UVB damages the RNA of the virus.

This study showed that UVB light could inactivate the virus in simulated saliva in around 20 minutes. But a study published a month later than the previous showed that sunlight alone could inactivate the virus in the same amount of time. This led the researchers to suspect that UVB-induced RNA inactivation “might not be the whole story”.

The second lab study showed that sunlight inactivates viruses in saliva within 10 to 20 minutes of exposure, just like UVB. Luzzatto-Fegiz and his team noted that the upper limit of this range is more than eight times faster than predicted by the first study’s theoretical models. Meanwhile, viruses cultured in a growth medium are inactivated more than three times faster than predicted.

In an article published in February in the Journal of Infectious Diseases, the researchers wrote that SARS-CoV-2 would have to be several times more sensitive to UVB than any currently known virus to make the theoretical models fit the lab study’s findings.

Alternatively, the researchers suggested that there could be another agent involved besides UVB. UVA, for example, might be playing a more active role than initially thought.

“People think of UVA as not having much of an effect, but it might be interacting with some of the molecules in the [saliva],” Luzzatto-Fegiz explained. Those molecules, in turn, could become highly reactive and interact with SARS-CoV-2, accelerating virus inactivation. This process is commonly applied in wastewater treatment. In a 2013 study, for example, researchers used UVA to disinfect wastewater.

Luzzatto-Fegiz and his team noted that if SARS-CoV-2 turned out to be sensitive to weaker wavelengths of light, then sunlight might be better able to mitigate virus transmission outdoors over a broader range of latitudes and daytime hours than previously thought. Areas far from the equator tend to receive little amounts of solar radiation while the amount of sunlight that trickles in the daytime decreases during dusk and dawn.

UVA radiation can also provide more accessible and safer methods of UV disinfection. Though UVC radiation can be manufactured, it is the most damaging form of UV light, raising safety concerns and limiting its practical applications.

“UVC is great for hospitals,” said Julie McMurry, a professor of environmental and molecular toxicology at Oregon State University and a co-author of the article. “But in other environments - for instance, kitchens or subways - UVC would interact with the particulates to produce harmful ozone.”

Yangying Zhu, a professor of mechanical engineering at UC Santa Barbara and another co-author of the article, noted that there are now widely available LED bulbs that are many times stronger than sunlight. These light bulbs can be used to accelerate virus inactivation while UVA rays can be potentially used to augment air filtration systems at a relatively low risk for humans.

Overall, the researchers recommended additional experiments to fully ascertain the effects of different wavelengths of UV light on viruses placed in different mediums.

Eulogies

Eulogy for an Angel
1992-Dec. 20, 2005

Freedom
2003-2018

Freedom sm

My Father
1918-2010

brents dad

Dr. Stan Dale
1929-2007

stan dale

MICHAEL BADNARIK
1954-2022

L Neil Smith

A. Solzhenitsyn
1918-2008

solzhenitsyn

Patrick McGoohan
1928-2009

mcgoohan

Joseph A. Stack
1956-2010

Bill Walsh
1931-2007

Walter Cronkite
1916-2009

Eustace Mullins
1923-2010

Paul Harvey
1918-2009

Don Harkins
1963-2009

Joan Veon
1949-2010

David Nolan
1943-2010

Derry Brownfield
1932-2011

Leroy Schweitzer
1938-2011

Vaclav Havel
1936-2011

Andrew Breitbart
1969-2012

Dick Clark
1929-2012

Bob Chapman
1935-2012

Ray Bradbury
1920-2012

Tommy Cryer
1949-2012

Andy Griffith
1926-2012

Phyllis Diller
1917-2012

Larry Dever
1926-2012

Brian J. Chapman
1975-2012

Annette Funnicello
1942-2012

Margaret Thatcher
1925-2012

Richie Havens
1941-2013

Jack McLamb
1944-2014

James Traficant
1941-2014

jim traficant

Dr. Stan Monteith
1929-2014

stan montieth

Leonard Nimoy
1931-2015

Leonard Nimoy

Stan Solomon
1944-2015

Stan Solomon

B. B. King
1926-2015

BB King

Irwin Schiff
1928-2015

Irwin Schiff

DAVID BOWIE
1947-2016

David Bowie

Muhammad Ali
1942-2016

Muhammed Ali

GENE WILDER
1933-2016

gene wilder

phyllis schlafly
1924-2016

phylis schafly

John Glenn
1921-2016

John Glenn

Charles Weisman
1954-2016

Charles Weisman

Carrie Fisher
1956-2016

Carrie Fisher

Debbie Reynolds
1932-2016

Debbie Reynolds

Roger Moore
1917-2017

Roger Moore

Adam West
1928-2017

Adam West

JERRY LEWIS
1926-2017

jerry lewis

HUGH HEFNER
1926-2017

Hugh Hefner

PROF. STEPHEN HAWKING
1942-2018

Hugh Hefner 

ART BELL
1945-2018

Art Bell

DWIGHT CLARK
1947-2018

dwight clark

CARL MILLER
1952-2017

Carl Miller

HARLAN ELLISON
1934-2018

Harlan Ellison

STAN LEE
1922-2018

stan lee

CARL REINER
1922-2020

Carl Reiner

SEAN CONNERY
1930-2020

dwight clark

L. NEIL SMITH
1946-2021

L Neil Smith

JOHN STADTMILLER
1946-2021

L Neil Smith