Dictator Obama fights ban on indefinite detention of Amerikans!
Fascist dictator seeks authority to lock up anyone forever without charges or evidence.
WASHINGTON (PNN) - August 7, 2012- The White House has filed an appeal in hopes of reversing a federal judge’s ruling that bans the unconstitutional indefinite military detention of Amerikans because attorneys for the illegitimate president say they are justified to imprison alleged terrorists without charges.
Manhattan federal court Judge Katherine Forrest ruled in May that the indefinite detention provisions signed into law late last year by illegitimate Fascist Police States of Amerika President Barack Obama failed to “pass constitutional muster” and ordered a temporary injunction to keep the military from locking up any person, Amerikan or other, over allegations of terrorist ties. On Monday, however, federal prosecutors representing illegitimate President Obama and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta filed a claim with the Second FPSA Circuit Court of Appeals in hopes of eliminating that ban.
The White House is arguing that as long as the indefinite detention law hasn’t been enforced yet there is no reason for a judge to invalidate it.
The fascist dictatorial government believes it is justified to have the authorization to lock up indefinitely anyone it suspects may be a terrorist because cases involving militants directly aligned against the good of the FPSA government warrant such punishment. Separate from Judge Forrest’s injunction, nine states have attempted to, at least in part, remove themselves from the unlawful indefinite and oppressive detention provisions included in the National Defense Authorization Act.
In section 1021 of the NDAA, the president’s authority to hold a terrorism suspect “without trial, until the end of the hostilities” is reaffirmed by Congress. Despite an accompanying signing statement voicing his opposition to that provision, illegitimate President Obama quietly inked his name to the NDAA on December 31, 2011. In May, however, a group of plaintiffs including notable journalists and civil liberty proponents challenged section 1021 in court, leading to Judge Forrest finding it unconstitutional one month later.
"There is a strong public interest in protecting rights guaranteed by the First Amendment," Forrest wrote in her 68-page ruling. "There is also a strong public interest in ensuring that due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment are protected by ensuring that ordinary citizens are able to understand the scope of conduct that could subject them to indefinite military detention."
The original plaintiffs, who include Pulitzer Prize-winner Chris Hedges, have asked Judge Forrest to make her injunction permanent. Oral arguments in the case are expected to begin this week.