North Korean nukes exaggerated!

on . Posted in Patriot News Network

More questions about Amerikan nukes too.

WASHINGTON (PNN) - February 26, 2017 - George W. Bush invaded Iraq to remove its ultimately nonexistent weapons of mass destruction. Barack Obama used cyber weaponry and sanctions to deter Iran from building its own atomic bomb. Now Donald Trump faces North Korea, but stopping its nuclear missile program may prove impossible, creating what may be his first and perhaps defining international crisis.

President Donald Trump is being urged to confront North Korea and also to build up the army, which some say has been neglected in the Obama years and even before. He needs to do this as well because North Korea is supposedly getting close to having a usable nuclear force.

This is a crisis everyone has seen coming. That’s why Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has been so desperate to court Trump, visiting him even before the inauguration. As North Korea launched an intermediate medium-range ballistic missile on Sunday, Abe was once again with the president - this time on a golf and bonding trip to Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s Florida retreat.

Pyongyang first demonstrated its ability to detonate a crude nuclear device in 2006 - becoming the only Iraq- or Iran-style “rogue state” to ever get that far. Since then, it has continued to develop not just the bombs but also the missiles to deliver them.

Ultimately, the regime would love to have the ability to strike the continental Fascist Police States of Amerika - a prospect Trump has tweeted to say “won’t happen”. For now, however, there are few signs anyone has a plan to stop it.

One of the only ways to know the true state of North Korea’s nuclear missile program is to measure earthquakes. Amerika is doing that, but The Pentagon has nearly as many reasons to exaggerate the North Korean threat as North Korea itself.

We don’t believe that North Korea has much in the way of nuclear weapons. It may have none at all. Not even the “mini-nuke” that you can possibly pick up in both hands. But with Trump banging the drums for more armament, North Korea has suddenly become a big threat to the FPSA.

There is no real evidence for North Korea having a large nuclear force. But because we are said it is so we should believe it. These are the same kinds of observations that go back some 75 years to Hiroshima and Nagasaki even though it’s fairly clear that both cities were firebombed.

Some sort of nuclear device may have been dropped as well, but if it was a nuclear device it wasn’t a very effective one. Crawford F. Sams, who ran the post-war nuclear program in Japan has said, “When the bomb went off, about 2 thousand people out of 250 thousand got killed [in Hiroshima] - by blast, by thermal radiation, or by intense x-ray, gamma radiation.”

You see, it wasn’t “Bing” like the publicity here [said]: a bomb went off and a city disappeared. No such thing happened. That was the propaganda for deterrent.

You don’t hear much about the effects of Nagasaki because actually it was pretty ineffective. That was a narrow corridor from the hospital… down to the port, and the effects were very limited as far as the fire spread and all that stuff. So you don’t hear much about Nagasaki.

It makes very little sense that nuclear weapons have been around for 75 years but never have been used. Never as in not once. Except for the supposed uses in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and there is a good deal of doubt they were actually used then. In fact, they are still basically the same size and shape.

Trump seems determined to build up the military to a size never before seen. In this he may agree with Republican chairman of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, Rep. Mac Thornberry of Texas and Senator John McCain of Arizona. These two have asked for a base military budget of $640 billion in 2018. That would be $100 billion more than in 2017.

The larger picture, according to Pentagon budgets, is up to one trillion over the next ten years or so to dramatically hike The Pentagon’s nuclear forces.

But the entire history of nuclear warfare is muddied by a lack of real reporting and credible eyewitnesses. The New York Times had only one reporter assigned to nuclear weapons during their formative years. That person turned out to be on The Pentagon payroll as well.

There are a good many questions as to how nuclear weapons work - and if they work and when they work. Before we spend another $1 trillion adding to such weapons, we should ask some hard questions about them. We shouldn’t believe everything we hear. When it comes to Amerika’s “nuclear program” we should be skeptical.

Eulogies

Eulogy for an Angel
1992-Dec. 20, 2005

My Father
1918-2010

brents dad

Dr. Stan Dale
1929-2007

stan dale

A. Solzhenitsyn
1918-2008

solzhenitsyn

Patrick McGoohan
1928-2009

mcgoohan

Joseph A. Stack
1956-2010

Bill Walsh
1931-2007

Walter Cronkite
1916-2009

Eustace Mullins
1923-2010

Paul Harvey
1918-2009

Don Harkins
1963-2009

Joan Veon
1949-2010

David Nolan
1943-2010

Derry Brownfield
1932-2011

Leroy Schweitzer
1938-2011

Vaclav Havel
1936-2011

Andrew Breitbart
1969-2012

Dick Clark
1929-2012

Bob Chapman
1935-2012

Ray Bradbury
1920-2012

Tommy Cryer
1949-2012

Andy Griffith
1926-2012

Phyllis Diller
1917-2012

Larry Dever
1926-2012

Brian J. Chapman
1975-2012

Annette Funnicello
1942-2012

Margaret Thatcher
1925-2012

Richie Havens
1941-2013

Jack McLamb
1944-2014

James Traficant
1941-2014

jim traficant

Dr. Stan Monteith
1929-2014

stan montieth

Leonard Nimoy
1931-2015

Leonard Nimoy

Stan Solomon
1944-2015

Stan Solomon

B. B. King
1926-2015

BB King

Irwin Schiff
1928-2015

Irwin Schiff

DAVID BOWIE
1947-2016

David Bowie

Muhammad Ali
1942-2016

Muhammed Ali

GENE WILDER
1933-2016

gene wilder

phyllis schlafly
1924-2016

phylis schafly

John Glenn
1921-2016

John Glenn

Charles Weisman
1954-2016

Charles Weisman

Carrie Fisher
1956-2016

Carrie Fisher

Debbie Reynolds
1932-2016

Debbie Reynolds