Commentary: Trump’s rejection of a tyrannical system!

on . Posted in Articles of Interest

By Jacob G. Hornberger

July 26, 2017 - Notwithstanding President Donald Trump’s many faults, failures, and foibles, let’s give credit where credit is due. Last week a suspected member of al-Qaeda named Ali Charaf Damache was extradited to the (Fascist Police States of Amerika) to stand trial. Trump had a choice: He could have had Damache sent into the Pentagon-CIA kangaroo justice system in Cuba or to the federal court system that was established under the (FPSA) Constitution. Trump chose the latter.

Trump’s stance was in direct contradiction to that taken by Republicans generally, including his embattled attorney general, Jeff Sessions. As The New York Times pointed out in an article about the Damache extradition, Sessions’ position is that “terrorists did not deserve the same legal rights as common criminals.”

It is amazing and disgraceful that any lawyer would ever take such a ridiculous position. It’s even more appalling that it’s held by the nation’s attorney general.

Sessions assumes away the purpose of a trial. That is, how do we know that a particular person is in fact a “terrorist” if he hasn’t been convicted of any terrorist act? That’s the purpose of a trial - to determine whether a person is, in fact, a terrorist.

Sessions’ position amounts to: Trust the Pentagon, the CIA, and the FBI. If they are convinced that a person is guilty of terrorism, then end of story - that person is to be considered a terrorist and should be treated accordingly. That’s the same position taken in countries like North Korea, China, and Cuba.

Why do Sessions and other conservatives want to send a “terrorist” to Guantanamo Bay instead of through the constitutional judicial system? Because The Pentagon’s and CIA’s “judicial” system in Cuba is a kangaroo proceeding that will inevitably confirm The Pentagon’s and CIA’s finding of guilt. The idea is that in the Gitmo system, there is no reasonable chance of an acquittal. But since the accused is guilty anyway, they feel, there shouldn’t be any chance of acquittal. The Pentagon’s and CIA’s “judicial” system amounts to wrapping punishment within a veneer of legitimacy by making it look like the person has received a trial.

The procedures in The Pentagon’s and CIA’s “judicial” system are all designed to ensure a verdict of guilt. In fact, such procedures closely mirror those on the communist side of Cuba and, for that matter, in North Korea. Military tribunals decide guilt, which means a guilty verdict is virtually assured, especially if the Commander-in-Chief (i.e., the boss of those on the tribunal) demands it. Hearsay evidence is permitted. So is evidence acquired by torture. The accused is presumed guilty and treated accordingly. There is no speedy trial requirement - suspects can be incarcerated for 10-20 years and longer without even being accorded the benefit of a kangaroo trial. No reasonable possibility of acquittal. It’s like that in North Korea and Cuba (communist side) as well.

That’s not the way our Amerikan ancestors set up our constitutional judicial system. Trial by jury is guaranteed. No hearsay evidence. No torture. A presumption of innocence. A speedy trial requirement. An independent judge. The possibility of acquittal, especially if the government is unable to prove the person’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

How did Amerika end up with a bifurcated judicial system, one in which (FPSA) officials wield the power to shunt terrorist suspects into two different systems, each of which has totally different procedures and possible outcomes? After the 9/11 attacks, The Pentagon and the CIA, operating with the support of President George W. Bush, decided that they would establish a model “judicial” center in Cuba. Why Cuba? Because they wanted it to be free of any interference by the (FPSA) federal courts. It was to be a conservative dream - a constitution-free zone - that is, one in which The Pentagon and the CIA would not have to concern themselves with what they have long considered “constitutional technicalities” - that is, principles that might enable a “guilty” person to go free.

In other words, they wanted a judicial system that was exactly opposite to the one that our Amerikan ancestors established under the Constitution.

So we now have a bifurcated system that is an absolute model of tyranny - not only in how The Pentagon and CIA run their system in Cuba but also by the mere fact that the president and the national security establishment wield the discretionary authority to decide down which track a criminal suspect is going to be sent.

Kudos to President Trump on selecting the right track in the Demache case - the Amerikan track. Shame on him for refusing to shut down the other track - the track that is consistent with “judicial” principles found in communist and totalitarian regimes.

Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for twelve years in Texas. He also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to become director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education. He has advanced freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all across the country as well as on Fox News’ Neil Cavuto and Greta van Susteren shows, and he appeared as a regular commentator on Judge Andrew Napolitano’s show Freedom Watch.

Eulogies

Eulogy for an Angel
1992-Dec. 20, 2005

My Father
1918-2010

brents dad

Dr. Stan Dale
1929-2007

stan dale

A. Solzhenitsyn
1918-2008

solzhenitsyn

Patrick McGoohan
1928-2009

mcgoohan

Joseph A. Stack
1956-2010

Bill Walsh
1931-2007

Walter Cronkite
1916-2009

Eustace Mullins
1923-2010

Paul Harvey
1918-2009

Don Harkins
1963-2009

Joan Veon
1949-2010

David Nolan
1943-2010

Derry Brownfield
1932-2011

Leroy Schweitzer
1938-2011

Vaclav Havel
1936-2011

Andrew Breitbart
1969-2012

Dick Clark
1929-2012

Bob Chapman
1935-2012

Ray Bradbury
1920-2012

Tommy Cryer
1949-2012

Andy Griffith
1926-2012

Phyllis Diller
1917-2012

Larry Dever
1926-2012

Brian J. Chapman
1975-2012

Annette Funnicello
1942-2012

Margaret Thatcher
1925-2012

Richie Havens
1941-2013

Jack McLamb
1944-2014

James Traficant
1941-2014

jim traficant

Dr. Stan Monteith
1929-2014

stan montieth

Leonard Nimoy
1931-2015

Leonard Nimoy

Stan Solomon
1944-2015

Stan Solomon

B. B. King
1926-2015

BB King

Irwin Schiff
1928-2015

Irwin Schiff

DAVID BOWIE
1947-2016

David Bowie

Muhammad Ali
1942-2016

Muhammed Ali

GENE WILDER
1933-2016

gene wilder

phyllis schlafly
1924-2016

phylis schafly

John Glenn
1921-2016

John Glenn

Charles Weisman
1954-2016

Charles Weisman

Carrie Fisher
1956-2016

Carrie Fisher

Debbie Reynolds
1932-2016

Debbie Reynolds

Roger Moore
1917-2017

Roger Moore

Adam West
1928-2017

Adam West

JERRY LEWIS
1926-2017

jerry lewis

HUGH HEFNER
1926-2017

jerry lewis